Re: Gump Integration

2003-03-01 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sam Ruby wrote: So, I believe that the best thing we can do is to expose two different projects to gump: - cocoon core - cocoon blocks the first will be a normal project, with the usual direct dependencies. the second will be a different type of project, where the project descriptor will h

Re: Gump Integration

2003-02-28 Thread Sam Ruby
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: My two cents: what you just did was significantly reduce the number of people who can keep this updated. My experience in the past has been that this always is a bad thing, but perhaps Cocoon will prove me wrong. I'm aware of the fact that it significantly reduced the nu

Re: Gump Integration

2003-02-28 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 28/02/2003 17.41: ... Cocoon will (sooner or later) move to an indirect dependency graph. This will require a special build system, probably with special ant tasks. I think we'll make an effort to make these tasks bootstrappable with basic Ant and JAXP dependencie