RE: Possible Entity Resolving Bug

2002-10-12 Thread Jeremy Aston
People may recall that I raised a possible entity resolving bug in 2.0.3 where if you specified a public id and system id and then wanted to use a catalog for entity resolution you would never see the system id. Well, I have finally got round to do some more checking and thanks to some suggestion

RE: Possible Entity Resolving Bug

2002-09-13 Thread David Crossley
Jeremy Aston wrote: > > Thanks for the response. I'm glad it's not just me and my ever expanding > understanding of entity catalogs that have gone loopy! For the sake of > brevity I'm cutting the previous stuff and just responding to this bit > > >> This does not appear to be a fundamental c

RE: Possible Entity Resolving Bug

2002-09-08 Thread Jeremy Aston
Hi David, Thanks for the response. I'm glad it's not just me and my ever expanding understanding of entity catalogs that have gone loopy! For the sake of brevity I'm cutting the previous stuff and just responding to this bit >> This does not appear to be a fundamental catalog problem. I m

Re: Possible Entity Resolving Bug

2002-09-08 Thread David Crossley
Jeremy Aston wrote: > Hi, > > I have been doing some work with entity catlogs and have noticed some > interesting behaviour. It appears system ids are being ignored if used with > a DOCTYPE declaration, only public ids are picked up. I can successfully > map something like: > > "http://www.pi

RE: Possible Entity Resolving Bug

2002-09-08 Thread Jeremy Aston
Just to add a little more info... I have taken note of the two search modes allowed (prefer=public or prefer=system) in the CatalogManger.properties. Every thing seems correct here so this leads me even more to question exactly why is not passed to the catalog for matching but is. Can anyone