Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi team,
After a looong time, I'm trying to run the samples in 2.1 and I obtain
_a lot_ of errors, which BTW aren't formatted using the usual stylesheet.
Is it "normal" (i.e. they are currently broken in the CVS), or do you
folks have it running nicely which would mean a p
That's what I'm using - are you not seeing a speed up? Maybe it's just the
build speed up that makes the whole process feel faster? Maybe it's
wishful thinking?
Geoff
At 03:27 PM 3/7/2003, you wrote:
Geoff Howard wrote:
> 3) There must be some way to get them all working manually because no
Geoff Howard wrote:
> 3) There must be some way to get them all working manually because
no one
> seems to have complained about this, and development is continuing
(unless
> everyone else has frozen their cvs until the build refactoring is
complete).
Not sure, but would love to know!
Even wo
At 02:46 PM 3/7/2003, you wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Geoff Howard wrote:
...
> 3) There must be some way to get them all working manually because no one
> seems to have complained about this, and development is continuing (unless
> everyone else has frozen their cvs until the build refactoring is
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Geoff Howard wrote:
> 1) the samples build refactoring isn't done yet
This is the case, I think.
> 3) There must be some way to get them all working manually because no one
> seems to have complained about this, and development is continuing (unless
> everyone else has frozen
Me too - I have had a little more luck I think including the docs, but many
(i'd guess 50%) are still broken, and the error messages are not formatted.
I'd assumed:
1) the samples build refactoring isn't done yet
2) the error message formatting might actually be when the error is caught
by the c
It is currently brooken to mee to. :-(
Antonio Gallardo
> Hi team,
>
> After a looong time, I'm trying to run the samples in 2.1 and I obtain
> _a lot_ of errors, which BTW aren't formatted using the usual
> stylesheet.
>
> Is it "normal" (i.e. they are currently broken in the CVS), or do you
> f
