On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 07:27 US/Pacific, Santiago Gala wrote:
Matthew Langham wrote:
(...)
reducing our role. But I feel that if you are a committer - you should
commit. And this is something I will not be able to do in the near
future.
Not in the original sense anyway.
Reading, watching
Matthew Langham wrote:
You mean I get a -1 on wanting to leave? It's a prison :-).
No. It's not a -1, nobody can force you to do something or to keep a
title if you don't want it.
If you feel that having this title is hurting you in any way (and you
don't even have to specify why), I'll be happ
Stefano,
> Uff, don't use titles like those, they scare the crap out of me :)
Sorry about the title. Just waking people up :-).
> Wow, you are the first person ever who asked to be removed for
> committership.
>
Really? I am surprised. Being a committer makes me feel I should be
committing (cod
Matthew Langham wrote:
(...)
reducing our role. But I feel that if you are a committer - you should
commit. And this is something I will not be able to do in the near future.
Not in the original sense anyway.
Reading, watching and answering emails is "committing" knowledge to the
project repositor
Matthew Langham wrote:
Don't worry - this is good news really :-).
Uff, don't use titles like those, they scare the crap out of me :)
A few weeks ago you - the developers - voted me in to the Cocoon
committer-world. Although somewhat sceptical I accepted proudly. Now I would
like to give up being
"Matthew Langham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't worry - this is good news really :-).
>
> A few weeks ago you - the developers - voted me in to the Cocoon
> committer-world. Although somewhat sceptical I accepted proudly. Now I would
> like to give up being a committer - and as the PMC consi
