Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Please, don't jump to conclusions: I run Cocoon as xindice client with
> xindice.jar and xmldb.jar: just 532968 bytes. If to include full-blown
> xindice... Yes, thanks to openorb, it's 2.5M :(
I'd really love to know how you managed to do it. There are significant
por
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > > > Should we start shipping XIndice with Cocoon? (I know Cocoon is
> already
> > > > big enough, but by making it easier to people to assemble things
> is the
> > > > way to go... at least until we have an ap
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > Should we start shipping XIndice with Cocoon? (I know Cocoon is
already
> > > big enough, but by making it easier to people to assemble things
is the
> > > way to go... at least until we have an apt-get-like thing for
java.
> > > still
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
> (sorry for this late reply: my MX host changed its IP so I had huge
> email problems lately).
bah, telecom italia users :)
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> >>with an XPath-enabled DirectoryGenerator wich uses the X-pointerish
> >>syntax already implemented in the XML
(sorry for this late reply: my MX host changed its IP so I had huge
email problems lately).
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>with an XPath-enabled DirectoryGenerator wich uses the X-pointerish
>>syntax already implemented in the XMLDB stuff.
>>
>
> Way cool, I badly needed this for Forrest :)
Grea
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
> Ciao,
>
> in these days I wanted to test Eclipse (BTW, looks really great! too bad
> it does a bad job with indenting...) and I found the time to come up
> with an XPath-enabled DirectoryGenerator wich uses the X-pointerish
> syntax already implemented in the XMLDB s
