Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-05 Thread Judson Lester
On Monday 04 February 2002 06:41 pm, Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:10:33 -0600, Judson Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you see this point of view? I could also see how this might be > > super-trivial and something you'd ignored. But rewriting URLs to > > mark session

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-04 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 02:05:36 -, Allan Erskine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, I see your point. Allan and you propose a two level indirection > > scheme to obtain the continuation. The first level is keyed by the > > cookie, and points to the session object. The second level is keyed by > >

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-04 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:10:33 -0600, Judson Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 01 February 2002 06:29 pm, Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > Hi Judson, > > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:53:32 -0600, Judson Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Would a session not be the appropriate place to st

RE: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Allan Erskine
> Ah, I see your point. Allan and you propose a two level indirection > scheme to obtain the continuation. The first level is keyed by the > cookie, and points to the session object. The second level is keyed by > the URL and points to the continuation. Gahh - this is getting complicated! I didn

RE: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Allan Erskine
all the corresponding transformations/aggregations on the resulting data. Does this sound OK/familiar to what others are thinking? Allan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ovidiu Predescu Sent: 02 February 2002 00:30 To: Judson Lester Cc: Allan Er

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Judson Lester
On Friday 01 February 2002 06:29 pm, Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > Hi Judson, > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:53:32 -0600, Judson Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Would a session not be the appropriate place to store continuations > > > > and associated data? The URL strikes me as a really bad ide

RE: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Allan Erskine
ter... Allan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ovidiu Predescu Sent: 01 February 2002 02:51 To: Allan Erskine Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: first impressions on continuations idea Hi Allan, [I've Cc-ed cocoon-dev, as I believe

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Hi Judson, On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:53:32 -0600, Judson Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Would a session not be the appropriate place to store continuations and > > > associated data? The URL strikes me as a really bad idea, as it should > > > be a logic-level address (ie foo.com/add) rath

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-02-01 Thread Judson Lester
Hey there Ovidiu. I don't know if Allan reads the dev list, but regards if he's listening. > > But I've made my way through the papers you sent, and the relevant > > threads - I really love it. > > I loved it too when I saw it the first time ;-) > Which makes at least three of us. Too often t

Re: first impressions on continuations idea

2002-01-31 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Hi Allan, [I've Cc-ed cocoon-dev, as I believe you bring up some good points.] On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:32:50 -, Allan Erskine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry this has been long in coming - it's really busy for me right now. No problem, it's been busy for me too. > But I've made my way th