Re: log analysis

2002-02-27 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 09:09, Bert Van Kets wrote: >. . . > but I'm not going to learn PERL to get a Cocoon app going, even if > PERL is a better text parser. Is there a generator that can parse > the log files at this time? You might want to have a look at chaperon (http://sourceforge.n

Re: log analysis

2002-02-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Berin Loritsch wrote: > It's amazing how popular Britney Spears is with > teenagers. It also narrowed down the proxy request to the machine > making it. That way the teachers were able to help kids with certain > "problems". (Considering it was a church educating the students it was > entirely

Re: log analysis

2002-02-26 Thread Bert Van Kets
Thanks, but I'm not going to learn PERL to get a Cocoon app going, even if PERL is a better text parser. Is there a generator that can parse the log files at this time? Bert At 10:36 26/02/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Bert Van Kets wrote: >>With all the tools that are built into cocoon lately, is i

Re: log analysis

2002-02-26 Thread Berin Loritsch
Bert Van Kets wrote: > With all the tools that are built into cocoon lately, is it possible to > generate XML from web server log files? I'd like to parse log files > from Apache and IIS. > How would I do this? > Bert Personally, I find that PERL is the language of choice for log munging. You