Ah! Ok.
> Don't see any other possibility, but then I haven't worked with BLOBs so
far.
> Only one would want to use buffer
I'll be look at this and push it along. It would be understood that the
input for the blob is a byte array.
> *Personnally,* I prefer insert/update/delete to happen in the
On 10.Jun.2002 -- 07:56 AM, Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Testing today.
>
> Perhaps because reading xsl format is not my strong suit, I am not seeing
> how the esql:parameter could help push a blob into a database. I'll have to
> test. I looked at the callable statement example
Oh no,
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: getBlob patch for esql
> On 09.Jun.2002 -- 07:47 AM, Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
> > I needed blobs. I only added getBlob into a byte array. Setting a
>
> Thanks for your patch. Applie
On 09.Jun.2002 -- 07:47 AM, Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
> I needed blobs. I only added getBlob into a byte array. Setting a
Thanks for your patch. Applied to HEAD. Please cross-check.
> blob works best if done with a prepared statement. If there is
> interest I can put in PreparedStatement func
Hi,
I needed blobs. I only added getBlob into a
byte array. Setting a blob works best if done with a prepared
statement. If there is interest I can put in PreparedStatement
functionality. The life span of a prepared statement may be short albeit
it would allow Blobs to be pushed into a
