> Hi!
>
> > Sorry I was wrong,
> > when doing it properly (caching everything that can be cached, and
> > using the Translet), xsltc performs much better than xalan (twice
> > faster in my examples), and even a bit better than Saxon.
>
> Couldn't you show send me the code ?
Hi again guys, sorry fo
Hi!
> Sorry I was wrong,
> when doing it properly (caching everything that can be
> cached, and using the Translet), xsltc performs much better
> than xalan (twice faster in my examples), and even a bit
> better than Saxon.
Couldn't you show send me the code ?
The following was used in benchmark
Sorry I was wrong,
when doing it properly (caching everything that can be cached, and using
the Translet),
xsltc performs much better than xalan (twice faster in my examples), and
even a bit
better than Saxon.
But, when using it as a normal transformer (Template instead of Translet)
both of them
(
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé : vendredi 15 novembre 2002 12:05
Objet : RE: interesting benchmarks
| On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, MikhailFedotov wrote:
|
| > Hi!
| >
| > > That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ?
| >
| &g
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, MikhailFedotov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ?
>
> > xsltc is rated even worse then xalanj itself...
>
> Still no reply. Comments anyone ? I wonder that was the cause of
> such perfomance of xsltc in those tests - tests
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: interesting benchmarks
|
>---
Hi!
> That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ?
> xsltc is rated even worse then xalanj itself...
Still no reply. Comments anyone ? I wonder that was the cause of
such perfomance of xsltc in those tests - tests themselves, or
particular
misfeatures of xsltc triggered
Hi guys,
That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ?
xsltc is rated even worse then xalanj itself...
Mikhail
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi guys,
That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ?
xsltc is rated even worse then xalanj itself...
Mikhail
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTEC
