Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > >
> > > > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And BTW there has never been a map:label element in the original
> > > > proposal as Stefano told me.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> > > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > >
> > > And BTW there has never been a map:label element in the original
> > > proposal as Stefano told me. But as we had it in for such a
> long time
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> > And BTW there has never been a map:label element in the original
> > proposal as Stefano told me. But as we had it in for such a long time is
> > it appropriate to move it back in?
> >
>
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> And BTW there has never been a map:label element in the original
> proposal as Stefano told me. But as we had it in for such a long time is
> it appropriate to move it back in?
>
No, I'm against this.
To clearify this situ
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> Does noone know something about the map:label?
My vote goes to remove it.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich N
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
And BTW there has never been a map:label element in the original
proposal as Stefano told me. But as we had it in for such a long time is
it appropriate to move it back in?
Giacomo
> Nice work, Giacomo!
>
> Do we now still support the map:label elem
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Nice work, Giacomo!
>
> Do we now still support the map:label element? Or should we better
> remove it from the sitemap?
Oops, I forgot to mention that there isn't any map:label element
anymore. Does that give any problems?
Giacomo
>
> Carsten
>
>
Does noone know something about the map:label?
Carsten
> -Original Message-
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: label/view refinement
>
>
> Nice work, Giacomo!
>
giacomo wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I've commited a change to the sitemap.xsl that turns it now close to the
> proposed view concept. As you can see in the commit message there are
> the following enhancements:
>
> 1. you can use more that one label-value (label="content,link rdf")
>separated by
Quoting Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> giacomo a écrit :
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > I've commited a change to the sitemap.xsl that turns it now close to
> the
> > proposed view concept. As you can see in the commit message there are
> > the following enhancements:
> >
> > 1. you can use mor
giacomo a écrit :
>
> Hi all
>
> I've commited a change to the sitemap.xsl that turns it now close to the
> proposed view concept. As you can see in the commit message there are
> the following enhancements:
>
> 1. you can use more that one label-value (label="content,link rdf")
>separated
Nice work, Giacomo!
Do we now still support the map:label element? Or should we better
remove it from the sitemap?
Carsten
Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I've commited a change to the sitemap.xsl that turns it now close to the
> proposed view concept. As you can see in the commit message
Hi all
I've commited a change to the sitemap.xsl that turns it now close to the
proposed view concept. As you can see in the commit message there are
the following enhancements:
1. you can use more that one label-value (label="content,link rdf")
separated by comma or blank.
2. the aggregate
13 matches
Mail list logo
