JDBC startup, was: "startup order"

2002-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
l > > should be more resilient to the temporary network issues, and it should > > try to create connections, till success, with some time interval. > > > > Common example of why this is required: if tomcat and Oracle are started > > on the same machine as services, and

Re: "startup order", was: [Vote]: New Release

2002-03-14 Thread Christian Haul
g created. I think pool > should be more resilient to the temporary network issues, and it should > try to create connections, till success, with some time interval. > > Common example of why this is required: if tomcat and Oracle are started > on the same machine as services, and *

"startup order", was: [Vote]: New Release

2002-03-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
ould be of importance), but in the way how JDBC pool is being created. I think pool should be more resilient to the temporary network issues, and it should try to create connections, till success, with some time interval. Common example of why this is required: if tomcat and Oracle are started on

startup order

2002-03-07 Thread Christian Haul
Hi. although it seems to be only me who is bitten by a wrong startup order I have investigated the problem a bit further. The actual order in which components are initialized seems to be more or less random, based on the hash values computed in org.apache.avalon.excalibur.collections.BucketMap