Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Hi team,
We have in our build some conditional compilation against javax
activation, mail and transaction because it was said that we cannot
redistribute them.
Reading the license for these packages, I'm not sure redistri
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Bernhard Huber wrote:
hi,
i think writing a single packages.xml is better than maintaing 84
package.html files.
IMO, a centralized XML file may not be better as far as keeping it up
to date is concerned :
- people may often forget to update a central file far away fr
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
>
> >There is one important reason for having separate
> >package.xml next to the component source code ... when
> >Cocoon is able to add new components (blocks?) automatically.
>
> Can you elaborate more on this ? As far as I understand them (they're
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > Bernhard Huber wrote:
> i think writing a single packages.xml is better than maintaing 84
> package.html files.
> >>>
> >>> IMO, a centralized XML file may not be better as far as keeping it up
> >>> to date is concerned :
> >>> - peo