Re: Licence for javax activation, mail & transaction

2003-01-04 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Sylvain Wallez wrote: Hi team, We have in our build some conditional compilation against javax activation, mail and transaction because it was said that we cannot redistribute them. Reading the license for these packages, I'm not sure redistri

Re: Javadocs: need basic package information

2003-01-04 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sylvain Wallez wrote: Bernhard Huber wrote: hi, i think writing a single packages.xml is better than maintaing 84 package.html files. IMO, a centralized XML file may not be better as far as keeping it up to date is concerned : - people may often forget to update a central file far away fr

Re: Javadocs: need basic package information

2003-01-04 Thread David Crossley
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > >There is one important reason for having separate > >package.xml next to the component source code ... when > >Cocoon is able to add new components (blocks?) automatically. > > Can you elaborate more on this ? As far as I understand them (they're

Re: Javadocs: need basic package information

2003-01-04 Thread David Crossley
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Bernhard Huber wrote: > i think writing a single packages.xml is better than maintaing 84 > package.html files. > >>> > >>> IMO, a centralized XML file may not be better as far as keeping it up > >>> to date is concerned : > >>> - peo