forward text inclusion.
Randy
-Original Message-
From: Lai, Harry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [doc] draft FAQ xinclude/cinclude
Hi Shannon,
Sorry for the slow response. I'm not actually sure
ils on this (whether CInclude is faster than
XInclude for reasons besides caching)?
Harry
-Original Message-
From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [doc] draft FAQ xinclude/cinclude
On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 1
On Friday, June 21, 2002, at 10:25 AM, Lai, Harry wrote:
Thanks Harry.
> Hi Diana,
>
> This looks like a great summary to me! Just FYI, I also found an older
> post
> indicating that CInclude has better performance than XInclude (mentioned
> near the bottom of the post).
>
> http://marc.thea
27;d probably also be worth adding to the FAQ. Thanks!
Harry
-Original Message-
From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [doc] draft FAQ xinclude/cinclude
Q.
What are the similarities and differences of xinclude and
> From: Diana Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Q.
> What are the similarities and differences of xinclude and cinclude?
>
> A.
>
> Similarities
> - Both provides mechanisms to include content from other documents
> - Both support cocoon:/ protocol (i.e. they both use Cocoon's
resolver).
>
Q.
What are the similarities and differences of xinclude and cinclude?
A.
Similarities
- Both provides mechanisms to include content from other documents
- Both support cocoon:/ protocol (i.e. they both use Cocoon's resolver).
xinclude transformer
- implements the W3C XInclude spec.
- allows yo
