Robert,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:35 AM
Subject: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I'
I believe that XMLForms are accessed by the pipeline via an Action
Component, based on AbstractXMLFormAction. This is the Component that can
& would handle most of what you are saying below. The Action taken by the
Action will depend on the command encoded in the request; one could, at
the end of
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> My only point here is that the message is somewhat misleading. The
>
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> Robert,
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:35 AM
velin
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Ellis Parrott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2002 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
>
> I believe that XMLForms are accessed by the pipeline vi
I've just begun looking at XMLForms, and I wonder if this makes any sense:
When the client posts the XForm, we can start with a completely empty DOM
which is filled in according to the XPath expressions in the XForm.
This DOM starts a pipeline as, say, a PostedXFormGenerator.
Then, there could
Thank you,
Ivelin
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Schram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 11:50 PM
Subject: Re: Building a DOM Model with XMLForms
> I've just begun looking at XMLForms, and I wonder if this ma
> I'm working on a project prototype where I'm trying to implement a kind of
> "wizard" using XMLForms. The difference is that I'd like the XML docs
> written by the content people to define the resulting XML doc, without
> specifying it ahead of time. In other words, I'd like the elements &
> att
Hi folks,
I'm working on a project prototype where I'm trying to implement a kind of
"wizard" using XMLForms. The difference is that I'd like the XML docs
written by the content people to define the resulting XML doc, without
specifying it ahead of time. In other words, I'd like the elements &