Thanks,
El Miércoles, 25 de Septiembre de 2002 01:32, Tuomo Lesonen escribió:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > Its a nice workaround. But what about to built the final logicsheet? many
> > people will use it. I am trying to do that. I am sure you will
> I saw that many people in thi maillist prefer make XSLT tranforms and few
> people use XSP. Why?
A couple of reasons why I avoid using XSP: 1) It's more or less proprietary
(though that is sort of changing). XSLT can be run with many different
application servers. 2) XSLT is functional progr
Hi Antonio!
I really tried to answer to your question about the auth-framework, but
couldn't connect to my mailserver at all! :( Now it works again... But it
seems that you're going through the same steps than I did a while ago.
(With my own help)
At this moment, the option of using 2 pipelines
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> Many thanks!
>
> Its a nice workaround. But what about to built the final logicsheet? many
> people will use it. I am trying to do that. I am sure you will welcome it.
>
> BTW, why is the XSL transform support first than the XSP? I feel like I
Many thanks!
Its a nice workaround. But what about to built the final logicsheet? many
people will use it. I am trying to do that. I am sure you will welcome it.
BTW, why is the XSL transform support first than the XSP? I feel like I am
doing this in the wrong way, like I need to prefer XSL tr
Hi Antonio!
I really tried to answer to your question about the auth-framework, but
couldn't connect to my mailserver at all! :( Now it works again... But it
seems that you're going through the same steps than I did a while ago.
(With my own help)
At this moment, the option of using 2 pipelines