Re: JDBC for SQL Server 2000

2002-06-13 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stephen Ng wrote: > Why not the free one from Microsoft? Because it's slooow. Search in the archives of this list, I've already posted the link to a performance comparison twice. > -Original Message- > *From:* Parrott Geoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > *Sent:* Thur

RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000

2002-06-13 Thread Albertsen, Juergen
Title: JDBC for SQL Server 7 I can fully recommend JTurbo from New Atlanta. It's not free, but very stable and fast and not very expensive   http://www.newatlanta.com/ -Original Message-From: Parrott Geoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:30 PMTo: Coc

RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000

2002-06-13 Thread Stephen Ng
h for "JDBC SQL Server". --Steve > -Original Message- > From: telmo sa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000 > > > Can you give the url? > >

RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000

2002-06-13 Thread telmo sa
Can you give the url? Thank you. Telmo >From: "Stephen Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000 >Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 06:45:28 -0400 > >JDBC for SQL Server 7Why n

RE: JDBC for SQL Server 2000

2002-06-13 Thread Stephen Ng
Title: JDBC for SQL Server 7 Why not the free one from Microsoft? -Original Message-From: Parrott Geoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 6:30 AMTo: Cocoon-Users (E-mail)Subject: JDBC for SQL Server 2000 Hi   Slight amendment I now find out it is