Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-14 Thread Christian Haul
On 14.Jul.2002 -- 11:10 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 10:58 PM, Christian Haul wrote: > > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 04:24 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > > From: Christian Haul > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Now, if

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-14 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 10:58 PM, Christian Haul wrote: > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 04:24 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Hint: two start document events, two end document events. > > > > > >

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-14 Thread Christian Haul
On 12.Jul.2002 -- 10:58 PM, Christian Haul wrote: > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 04:24 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Hint: two start document events, two end document events. > > > > See my other email, my proposed patch uses include consumer. > >

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Christian Haul
On 12.Jul.2002 -- 04:24 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hint: two start document events, two end document events. > > See my other email, my proposed patch uses include consumer. > (not sure though why no output) Ah, beautiful! Yes! Now, if yo

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 08:42 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > { > > > org.apache.cocoon.components.parser.Parser newParser = null; > > > try { > > > newParser

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Christian Haul
On 12.Jul.2002 -- 08:42 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > { > > org.apache.cocoon.components.parser.Parser newParser = null; > > try { > > newParser = (org.apache.cocoon.components.parser.Parser) > > this.manager.

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Christian Haul
On 12.Jul.2002 -- 08:42 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > try { > > newParser = (org.apache.cocoon.components.parser.Parser) > > this.manager.lookup(org.apache.cocoon.components.parser.Parser.ROLE); > > XSPUtil.inclu

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Eric Dalquist
I am going to take a look at it today. -Eric Dalquist - Original Message - From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Eric Dalquist'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Christian Haul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On 12.Jul.2002 -- 07:20 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote: > > My util.xsl doesn't have an include-source. There is include-uri, > > include-file & include-expr. > > Yeah, it's in 2.1 only. Might work just to copy this file from 2.1 and > recompile > 2

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Christian Haul
On 12.Jul.2002 -- 07:20 AM, Eric Dalquist wrote: > My util.xsl doesn't have an include-source. There is include-uri, > include-file & include-expr. Yeah, it's in 2.1 only. Might work just to copy this file from 2.1 and recompile 2.0.3 with it. Or try the snippet below and place it in your util.xs

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Eric Dalquist
My util.xsl doesn't have an include-source. There is include-uri, include-file & include-expr. -Eric - Original Message - From: "Christian Haul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:14 AM Subject: Re: [Q] util:include-

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-12 Thread Christian Haul
On 11.Jul.2002 -- 10:03 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I just tried using cocoon://nav_bar.xsp but it still didn't work. > Looking in > > the core.log I found the following message: > > > > DEBUG (2002-07-11) 13:19.09:225 > [core.url-facto

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
"Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:03 PM > Subject: RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path > > > > > From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > I just tr

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Dalquist
gt; Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:03 PM Subject: RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path > > From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I just tried using cocoon://nav_bar.xsp but it still didn't work. > Looking in > > the core.log I found the following mes

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
nko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:02 PM > Subject: RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path > > > > > From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > I'm wondering if I can us

Re: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Dalquist
c Dalquist - Original Message - From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 12:02 PM Subject: RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path > > From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I&#

RE: [Q] util:include-uri relative path

2002-07-11 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I'm wondering if I can use include-uri to include the output of an XSP in > another XSP. I can get it to work if I use the full path but I don't want to > do it this way unless I can use a relative path. The file is being included > in site_for