Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-09-04 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
Sorry, I didn't realize you were one of the developers. I'll file a bug report at least, and see what I can do about checking out 2.1, but I don't have much time for this, either. Whatever changed, changed between 2.0.2 and 2.0.3, which ought to help highlight the problem code. -Christopher

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-09-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote: > Did any of the Cocoon developers read this thread? Should I post it to > cocoon-dev? I want to make sure these bugs get addressed. I am a Cocoon dev (I also wrote the error handling code, but it's not a compliment ATM I guess), but I have limited time AT

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-09-03 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
Did any of the Cocoon developers read this thread? Should I post it to cocoon-dev? I want to make sure these bugs get addressed. Thanks, Christopher Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I've attached some sample code that exhibits the > problem, and a sitemap, xcon

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-30 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
> BTW, are you using the compiled sitemap or the interpreted TreeProcessor > one? The interpreted one. > BTW, does the same error happen in 2.1? I don't know; we've been working solely with the released code. -Christopher --

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-30 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote: > Thanks for the reply. I've attached some sample code that exhibits the > problem, and a sitemap, xconf, and web.xml in case they are relevant. > Using this code, if you choose the URL /home (e.g., > http://localhost:8080/home , assuming the ROOT webapp), t

RE: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-29 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
thank you. I got it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Painter-Wakefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions did anyone get the mail with the attachments?  I had to resend it

RE: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-29 Thread Naquin, Beth
Title: RE: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions I got it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Painter-Wakefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions did anyone get the mail with

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-29 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
did anyone get the mail with the attachments? I had to resend it with fewer attachments because it was rejected as too large the first time. The second time it seemed to go through (I received it from cocoon-users), but I got a different message complaining about the size, plus a separate messa

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-29 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
aggh! The listserv host rejected my mail as too large. Okay, I'll try it again without the xconf and web.xml. If these seem relevant, I'll send them separately. - Forwarded by Christopher Painter-Wakefield/mcis/mc/Duke on 08/29/2002 03:06 PM - Thanks for the reply. I've attached some

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-29 Thread Christopher Painter-Wakefield
I agree users shouldn't see the stacktrace, but neither should they get a page that looks basically right but with no data, no errors, and no explanation that a problem has occurred - this might be even worse, as it might lead them to believe something (there is no data matching their search, for

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-28 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote: > Since we upgraded to Cocoon 2.0.3, we've been experiencing a very annoying > problem, which is that Cocoon seems to silently handle all exceptions. > I've tested it now with a couple of exceptions types: RuntimeExceptions > (thrown by the ESQL logicsheet) an

Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions

2002-08-28 Thread Andre Thenot
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 05:57 , Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote: > This problem (I won't say bug, in case it is something we've > done!) is very > detrimental to development, since we have to go look in the > logs to find > out we got an exception. Any help would be appreciated!