Sorry, I didn't realize you were one of the developers.
I'll file a bug report at least, and see what I can do about checking out
2.1, but I don't have much time for this, either. Whatever changed,
changed between 2.0.2 and 2.0.3, which ought to help highlight the problem
code.
-Christopher
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote:
> Did any of the Cocoon developers read this thread? Should I post it to
> cocoon-dev? I want to make sure these bugs get addressed.
I am a Cocoon dev (I also wrote the error handling code, but it's not a
compliment ATM I guess), but I have limited time AT
Did any of the Cocoon developers read this thread? Should I post it to
cocoon-dev? I want to make sure these bugs get addressed.
Thanks,
Christopher
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I've attached some sample code that exhibits the
> problem, and a sitemap, xcon
> BTW, are you using the compiled sitemap or the interpreted TreeProcessor
> one?
The interpreted one.
> BTW, does the same error happen in 2.1?
I don't know; we've been working solely with the released code.
-Christopher
--
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I've attached some sample code that exhibits the
> problem, and a sitemap, xconf, and web.xml in case they are relevant.
> Using this code, if you choose the URL /home (e.g.,
> http://localhost:8080/home , assuming the ROOT webapp), t
thank you.
I got it.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter-Wakefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions
did anyone get the mail with the attachments? I had to resend it
Title: RE: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions
I got it.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Painter-Wakefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: C2.0.3 silently ignoring exceptions
did anyone get the mail with
did anyone get the mail with the attachments? I had to resend it with
fewer attachments because it was rejected as too large the first time. The
second time it seemed to go through (I received it from cocoon-users), but
I got a different message complaining about the size, plus a separate
messa
aggh! The listserv host rejected my mail as too large. Okay, I'll try it
again without the xconf and web.xml. If these seem relevant, I'll send
them separately.
- Forwarded by Christopher Painter-Wakefield/mcis/mc/Duke on 08/29/2002
03:06 PM -
Thanks for the reply. I've attached some
I agree users shouldn't see the stacktrace, but neither should they get a
page that looks basically right but with no data, no errors, and no
explanation that a problem has occurred - this might be even worse, as it
might lead them to believe something (there is no data matching their
search, for
Christopher Painter-Wakefield wrote:
> Since we upgraded to Cocoon 2.0.3, we've been experiencing a very annoying
> problem, which is that Cocoon seems to silently handle all exceptions.
> I've tested it now with a couple of exceptions types: RuntimeExceptions
> (thrown by the ESQL logicsheet) an
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 05:57 , Christopher
Painter-Wakefield wrote:
> This problem (I won't say bug, in case it is something we've
> done!) is very
> detrimental to development, since we have to go look in the
> logs to find
> out we got an exception. Any help would be appreciated!
12 matches
Mail list logo