Thank you for your hint. I just tried out XPathDirectoryGenerator (scratchpad)
which essentially does what I need, but is a lot less messy than my initial
approach. However, also these results seem not to get cached... Presumably I
should save the result with something like a SourceWritingTransfor
After 1 minute of looking, it seems that the DirectoryGenerator is not
cacheable.
So it is going to re-read the directory every time you hit the pipeline.
Your Xincluded pieces might be cacheable, however. For instance, the
FileGenerator *is* cacheable (if you are using it).
If you can live wi
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 10:37, Martin Lüthi wrote:
> Dear Cocooners
>
> I wonder what would be the most efficient aggregation of many small xml
> documents in a directory. My present approach is very slow:
>
> 1. use directory-generator to make an index of documents
> 2. generate a document contai
On Thursday 05 September 2002 11:21, Martin Lüthi wrote:
> I
> want to aggregate all files in a directory, which is not possible with
> afaik.
You'll have to use CInclude or XInclude for this, along with a
DirectoryGenerator to get the list of files.
--
Bertrand Delacrétaz (codeconsult.ch, j
"u15603" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> have you ever use the inside the sitemap? It is easy to
> handle!
Well, with you have to know the names of the files, but I
want to aggregate all files in a directory, which is not possible with
afaik.
Thanks
Martin
--
Martin Lüthi [E
Hello Martin,
have you ever use the inside the sitemap? It is easy
to handle!
dirk
>Dear Cocooners
>
>I wonder what would be the most efficient aggregation of many small xml
>documents in a directory. My present approach is very slow:
>
>1. use directory-generator to make an index of document
