Ugo Cei wrote:
> It surely looks based on Cocoon as far as some architectural
> concepts are concerned. It does not look based on the Cocoon source
> code though. Or, at least, they don't say it is ;-).
True: OXF doesn't use a single line of code from Cocoon (as a matter
of fact we haven't even l
Matthew Langham wrote:
2.) http://www.orbeon.com/oxf/
i found this pointer today in the struts discussion trail. I did not
really investigate on this although it sounds quite interesting
but again i thought this belongs strongly to cocoon, if it is
feasible...
<<
Again something compl
>>
1.) www.cocoondev.org
This is a great site but i expected this under cocoon!
<<
And soon it may well be. Remember the Cocoon project is an _Apache_ project
and therefore runs on Apache hardware etc. etc. The cocoondev.org site is
completely different. It was started by Steven Noels from Out
Matthew Langham wrote:
Hi,
to be honest I have no idea what you are talking about :-).
Sorry, i meant
1.) www.cocoondev.org
This is a great site but i expected this under cocoon!
2.) http://www.orbeon.com/oxf/
i found this pointer today in the struts discussion trail. I did not
rea
Hi,
to be honest I have no idea what you are talking about :-).
>>
1.) Why are all such nice and nifty add ons developed all outside of cocoon
?
<<
Exactly which components/add-ons do you mean?
>>
2.) When i move to such an add on component, how can i enshure to keep up
with the releases of coco
