The Original Database Actions will stay as is just for compatibility or there
will be deprecated after a time.
I am asking because I dont see why will exist two database type of actions. As
I far as I know the Modular database Actions extends the original database
actions. This is why I dont s
On 08.Oct.2002 -- 08:08 AM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> Sorry, Chris I know this is a stupid question, but I want to be sure ;)
>
> I am using
> org.apache.cocoon.acting.DatabaseAddAction
>
> and not
> org.apache.cocoon.acting.modular.DatabaseAddAction
OK, wrong site ;-)
> The tags and
Sorry, but this does not work. :(
It raise the following error:
Not allowed to define mixed content in the element action at
jndi:/localhost/sitemap.xmap:193:116
Antonio Gallardo.
El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 07:33, Christian Haul escribió:
> On 08.Oct.2002 -- 07:22 AM, Antonio Gallardo R
Sorry, Chris I know this is a stupid question, but I want to be sure ;)
I am using
org.apache.cocoon.acting.DatabaseAddAction
and not
org.apache.cocoon.acting.modular.DatabaseAddAction
The tags and apply for
org.apache.cocoon.acting.DatabaseAddAction?
Second question ;)
Will continue the s
On 08.Oct.2002 -- 07:22 AM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 04:33, Christian Haul escribió:
> > > > If so, please note that the name of some modules have been changed and
> > > > that the compiled in default is rendered useless. There should be a
> > > > warning i
El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 04:33, Christian Haul escribió:
> > > If so, please note that the name of some modules have been changed and
> > > that the compiled in default is rendered useless. There should be a
> > > warning in your logs indicating this. Please add a
> > > request-attr and re
El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 04:33, Christian Haul escribió:
> On 08.Oct.2002 -- 02:49 AM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> > El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 01:09, Christian Haul escribió:
> > > On 07.Oct.2002 -- 11:32 PM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> >
> > The problem is into the dbAddA
On 08.Oct.2002 -- 02:49 AM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 01:09, Christian Haul escribió:
> > On 07.Oct.2002 -- 11:32 PM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> The problem is into the dbAddAction, because if I put the cli_id into the
> descriptor as part of the of
El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 01:09, Christian Haul escribió:
> On 07.Oct.2002 -- 11:32 PM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> > Thanks for the help!
> >
> > I found that in dbAddAction, we must to supply into the descriptor like
> > "key" all the values that cannot be null! This is not describen
On 07.Oct.2002 -- 11:32 PM, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> Thanks for the help!
>
> I found that in dbAddAction, we must to supply into the descriptor like "key"
> all the values that cannot be null! This is not describen into the
> documentation.
I'm not sure I understand right, but the ta
I forgot mention I am using PosgreSQL 7.2 :)
Antonio Gallardo
El Lunes, 07 de Octubre de 2002 23:32, Antonio Gallardo Rivera escribió:
> Thanks for the help!
>
> I found that in dbAddAction, we must to supply into the descriptor like
> "key" all the values that cannot be null! This is not descri
Thanks for the help!
I found that in dbAddAction, we must to supply into the descriptor like "key"
all the values that cannot be null! This is not describen into the
documentation.
I as not able to check my problem, because the FormValidatorAction tell that
all the valuse was there. But as I
12 matches
Mail list logo