Jeroen Cranendonk wrote:
snip/
Does anyone have any ideas of how to get round this, or how we could apporach
this differently ? (besides using the adress(for example) bean as a subclass
for the other bean, this would break if we want to use more then one generic
bean)
Why don't you use
Yay, thanks!
We did not know that xmlforms would understand this syntax. that's why we
didn't use composition :)
hmm, schematrons don't accidently support composition too do they ? :)
snip/
Does anyone have any ideas of how to get round this, or how we could
apporach this differently ?
