aster when it is released and the program is not changed much
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Olivier Rossel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: maandag 27 mei 2002 11:05
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: TreeProcessor performance
COuld you please give us your bench with a
COuld you please give us your bench with a brand new version of the
sitemap.xmap (for example, edit it, change a line, save the file,
measure the perf with a given processor, and reprocess all that for each
processor).
On a slow 128MB machine, sitemap compilation takes ages to complete.
TreePro
Graaf, Edgar de (fin) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Recently I installed the TreeProcessor instead of compiling. Everyone says
>it is faster then compiling the sitemap, so I didn't test it. Then I
>installed Saxon and tot test Saxon I did a Jmeter test. My application
>collapsed from 6 seconds average response
Hi,
Recently I installed the TreeProcessor instead of compiling. Everyone says
it is faster then compiling the sitemap, so I didn't test it. Then I
installed Saxon and tot test Saxon I did a Jmeter test. My application
collapsed from 6 seconds average response time to 20 seconds!? So I put
xalan
