On 04.Jul.2002 -- 05:59 PM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > Well, if you want to spare me the experimenting you could take the
> > ESQL components from one version and replace the other versions,
> > rebuild and retry. If this setup shows the same timings as before
>
> The problem is I do not have the c
> Well, if you want to spare me the experimenting you could take the
> ESQL components from one version and replace the other versions,
> rebuild and retry. If this setup shows the same timings as before
The problem is I do not have the cocoon sources for older version. If you are
able to identif
On 04.Jul.2002 -- 08:38 AM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > That looks bad, indeed. I will have a look at it but it will take some
> > time to reproduce these values (gimme a week or so). I take your word
> > for it that you haven't changed anything else around it like move the
> > DBMS to another machin
> That looks bad, indeed. I will have a look at it but it will take some
> time to reproduce these values (gimme a week or so). I take your word
> for it that you haven't changed anything else around it like move the
> DBMS to another machine, upgrade your network, CPU, RAM, JDK, JDBC
> driver or
> Just double checking. You've upgraded from 2.0.2 to 2.1-dev
> (snapshot), right? Could you try the same with a 2.0.3 CVS version?
Both cocoon versions are 2.1-dev (downloaded as cvs snapshots)
ouzo
--
__
| / \ |Leszek Gawron// \\
\_\\
On 02.Jul.2002 -- 04:05 PM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > It is the very same jadozoom driver. I cannot tell if the performance
> > degenerates but I think not. The difference is significant though.
> > ouzo
> here are some timings taken from cocoon log:
>
> version somewhere round 2002.04.20
> IN
> It is the very same jadozoom driver. I cannot tell if the performance
> degenerates but I think not. The difference is significant though.
> ouzo
here are some timings taken from cocoon log:
version somewhere round 2002.04.20
INFO HttpProcessor[80][4]/CocoonServlet: 'xspxml/cdn' Processe
On 02.Jul.2002 -- 03:09 PM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Christian Haul wrote:
> > On 02.Jul.2002 -- 11:55 AM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > > > Since multiple "important" DBMSs have problems with checking for
> > > > multiple result sets, it has been disabled by def
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Christian Haul wrote:
> On 02.Jul.2002 -- 11:55 AM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > > Since multiple "important" DBMSs have problems with checking for
> > > multiple result sets, it has been disabled by default for the current
> > > CVS version. It can be re-enab
On 02.Jul.2002 -- 11:55 AM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > Since multiple "important" DBMSs have problems with checking for
> > multiple result sets, it has been disabled by default for the current
> > CVS version. It can be re-enabled by using
> > yes Option
> > to .
> >
> > Please try again with a sn
> Since multiple "important" DBMSs have problems with checking for
> multiple result sets, it has been disabled by default for the current
> CVS version. It can be re-enabled by using
> yes Option
> to .
>
> Please try again with a snap shot newer than 2002-06-28
It works quite fine with only on
On 30.Jun.2002 -- 01:26 PM, Peter Royal wrote:
> On Sunday 30 June 2002 01:24 pm, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> > com.inzoom.adojni.ComException: Current provider does not support returning
> > multiple recordsets from a single execution. in ADODB.Recordset code=0
> > Type=1
> >
> > First I thought that
> The esql logicsheet is now using JDBC features that your driver does not
> support.
the older version that works for me is 1.18
the one that does not: 1.28
--
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leszek GawronICQ#
> The esql logicsheet is now using JDBC features that your driver does not
> support.
I do not really think that is a problem. See what gets generated:
220NIWELACJA020Niwelacja
ogrodu, przygotowanie do
nasadzeńUSŁUGI55Wykonanie
ogrodów010DZIEŃ11020701222032000-11
I forgot to include the query to prove that it's more than simple:
http://apache.org/xsp";
xmlns:esql="http://apache.org/cocoon/SQL/v2";>
cdn
select * from cdn.towary
On Sunday 30 June 2002 01:24 pm, Leszek Gawron wrote:
> com.inzoom.adojni.ComException: Current provider does not support returning
> multiple recordsets from a single execution. in ADODB.Recordset code=0
> Type=1
>
> First I thought that it's something wrong with msde provider or jdbc driver
> bu
Hello,
I had to connect cocoon to msde engine (do not ask why .. it will be ms sql
server in the final distribution) .. while searching for jdbc driver i have
found jadozoom from http://www.infozoom.de/NS/javaado.html
I've bin using win32 tomcat 4.0.1 with cocoon 2.1-dev (some weeks old dev
snaps
17 matches
Mail list logo
