WE don't have any decent screen shots ytet - we are still in formal
design...but I'll get back to you when we do...
--
From: Matthew Langham[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 4:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
In many databases TYPE is a reserved word, although some drivers will
allow it and others will not. You might try a test with a slightly different
column name.
--
From: Christian Haul[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21,
is it just me, or did the 1.4 JDK introduce a lot of grief here REQUIRING
changes to the jre/lib directory? Or is there another way to make this work?
--
From: Matt Williams[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:14 AM
I did the same thing using an action
--
From: Roger Hyam[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: writing xml to file
Yes please. Would be useful.
SANSONE,
very well.
That said, Things like NullPointer exceptions thrown during configure() ever
make it to the stack trace in the result, which made finding this a bit
harder, and even made it look a bit like my Action was not even being found.
--
From: Lewis, Andrew J
Sent
Are there any known efficiency differences between pipelines that use
resources for thier processing and pipelines that do equivalent processing
directly without declared resources?
Thanks!
-
Please check that your question has
I realize that this is not a general XSL forum, so if someone would
rather point me to a more appropriate forum, I have no problem with that,
but the people on this list generally seem to have the answers :)
I am having wierd namespace issues in XSLT using the document()
Has anyone here done any work with XSLTC with Cocoon 2?
If so, does it significantly impact transformation speed?
And of course, last, does anyone know of a Transformer that can be
used to wrap XSLTC Translets for inclusion into a pipeline?
Thanks!
: RE: XSLTC
From: Lewis, Andrew J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Has anyone here done any work with XSLTC with Cocoon 2?
Have not heard anything about it for a long time...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but seems that nobody working on this.
If so, does it significantly
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JDK 1.4 pre
Lewis, Andrew J wrote:
tools.jar must be in the WEB-INF/lib?
is that only if you use existing binaries instead of compiling yourself?
No, that is so that Cocoon
Realize that as bad as this sounds, many companies are acutally gathering
software patents for defensive purposes under the theory that if you have
enough of them you could sue over, no one will sue you over the ones they
have. It still elaves the little guy getting completely screwed. My point
actually - you need the EXE. Launching documents directly from the
autorun.inf is error prone, and unreliable. There is another technotes out
there that basically points out that the type of exec call they use is not
the ShellOpen but rather a lower leve exec so the program needs to be an EXE
or
I've just recently gone through a bit of research on this - servers have no obligation
to respect META tags - they are an HTML element, not a part of the HTTP protocol. As a
rule, if you want the server to care, you need to set tyhe header yourself. There are
exceptions to the rule, but I'm
just my two cents - I realize it can make things harder to develop in this case - but
I've been down this road a number of times - if you make it web based, I think you'll
find much broader acceptance. A Java app probably would be more efficient, but if you
look at the target users for content
I've looked at this as well and have a project (sorry, can't give the source to this
one) that does this kind of aggregation. The approach I took was to do that recursive,
granular compostion you are referring to within the generator. I basically reached the
conclusion that the process needed
Most big corporations do pay big bucks and go with corporate solutions. Of course, it
is amazing the level of stupid decision making that is possible in a corporation. That
said, I have implemented Cocon 1.x in a corporate world with great success. It is best
for low-profile projects where
The biggest difference in producing XML from JSP versus from XSP is that JSP, afaik
produces a text stream that then has to be parsed to do anything else with it. XSP
produces (again afaik) a SAX event stream, ready to be processed.
--
From: Sidharth[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
17 matches
Mail list logo
