RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-26 Thread Stephan Michels
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Geoff Howard wrote: Ok, you're not crazy - the build is in fact broken. Sort of. What is broken is an old validation target that was recently put back in (validate-jars in src/targets/validate-build.xml). It appears that everything is actually built correctly, but

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-26 Thread Geoff Howard
-Original Message- From: Stephan Michels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:26 AM To: cocoon-users Subject: RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Geoff Howard wrote: Ok, you're not crazy - the build is in fact broken. Sort of. What

Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Bobby Mitchell
I'm trying to build Cocoon-2.1-dev from cvs today, 3/24/03 on RedHat 8.0, Tomcat-4.1.21. The build fails with this error: root/java/cocoon-2.1/tools/src/check-jars.xsl:89:36: Warning! File lib/optional/mail.jar is declared in lib/jars.xml, but doesn't appear in the lib/ directory. mail.jar

Re: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Alex Romayev
Just a thought: 1. mail.jar has a different name, like mail-timestamp.jar -- then change jars.xml file to the right name. 2. mail.jar is not needed, remove it from jars.xml 3. mail.jar is somewhere else, put it into the lib directory. --- Bobby Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to

Re: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread neil
Re: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=104862608911688w=2 I like the way the build tries to let you include just what you want, but there are a few little problems with it. Yesterday I checked out the CVS HEAD and now using jdk-1.4.1, windows2000/cygwin ... 1. I tried excluding

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Geoff Howard
: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails Re: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=104862608911688w=2 I like the way the build tries to let you include just what you want, but there are a few little problems with it. Yesterday I checked out the CVS HEAD and now using jdk-1.4.1, windows2000

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Geoff Howard
I thought that was a problem that was fixed yesterday. When (what time about) was the checkout? Geoff -Original Message- From: Bobby Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails I'm trying

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Geoff Howard
: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:22 PM To: Cocoon-Users (E-mail) Subject: Re: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails Re: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=104862608911688w=2 I like the way the build tries to let you include just what you want, but there are a few little problems

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread neil
also tried -Dexclude.deprecated=yes). Cheers, Neil Bacon -Original Message- From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 26 March 2003 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails Neil, I can't reproduce this problem. I

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Tony Collen
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, neil wrote: 2. I had a look at build.xml and figured out that I need: ./build.sh \ -Dinclude.webapp.libs=yes \ -Dexclude.webapp.samples=yes \ -Dexclude.webapp.documenation=yes \ -Dexclude.webapp.javadocs=yes \ -Dexclude.scratchpad=yes \

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Geoff Howard
- From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails The build process for 2.1dev has very recently changed and is still stabilizing. While these problems may in fact be real

RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails

2003-03-25 Thread Geoff Howard
-Original Message- From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cocoon-2.1-dev build fails Unfortunately, when validate-jars was put back in, an override mechanism wasn't added so you're stuck