Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-20 Thread Jan Harkes
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:27:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I meant in fact rename/unlink conflict, which is more of a conflict than > unlink/unlink - the intent is less clear in this case. > Nevertheless, I would treat "unlink a non-existent name" as no conflict > independently of whether

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-20 Thread u+codalist-p4pg
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:05:20AM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:17:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > It seems that unlinking a snatched-away file leads to a conflict, > > while possibly it shouldn't? > I think I already downgraded the severity of unlink/unlink

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-20 Thread Jan Harkes
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:17:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:27:39AM -0400, Adam Wolbach wrote: > > I would like to poll the community to find out what the most common and > > annoying conflicts encountered are, in order to build a list of target > > application

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-20 Thread u+codalist-p4pg
Hello Adam. I am guessing that you mean in the first hand the file formats, not the applications themselves? On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:27:39AM -0400, Adam Wolbach wrote: > I would like to poll the community to find out what the most common and > annoying conflicts encountered are, in order to b

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-19 Thread Adam Wolbach
Greg Troxel wrote: Adam Wolbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Do you really mean that this is Linux specific and won't run on BSD? I think it would be useful to post the design and interface specification to ASRs. Does this work change the venus/kernel interface, or just interact with venus, o

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-19 Thread Greg Troxel
Adam Wolbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Do you really mean that this is Linux specific and won't run on BSD? >> I think it would be useful to post the design and interface >> specification to ASRs. Does this work change the venus/kernel >> interface, or just interact with venus, or just use r

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-19 Thread Adam Wolbach
The most important thing for me would be text files. (Actually the most important thing would be to fix all the reintegration/conflict bugs that cause conflicts when none should be happening - but that's gotten a lot better over the last few years.) The next most important thing would be to be

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-19 Thread Greg Troxel
The most important thing for me would be text files. (Actually the most important thing would be to fix all the reintegration/conflict bugs that cause conflicts when none should be happening - but that's gotten a lot better over the last few years.) The next most important thing would be to be ab

Re: Application-Specific Resolution

2006-04-19 Thread Ivan Popov
Hi Adam, On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:27:39AM -0400, Adam Wolbach wrote: > local/global varieties. The Linux ASR framework has been completed and > is working in an experimental branch in the git repository. Over the that sounds good. > applications to write resolvers for. For example, I have al