The Redhat 7.0 CD's do not have libdb 1.85 headers, I don't believe. If
you need to find them on the web, try going to http://rpmfind.net. You
may also be able to hack something like linking /usr/lib/libdb1.a to
/usr/lib/libdb.a and installing db2-devel from the redhat 7.0 cd. That
will create
I orinally tried running Coda on Redhat 7.0 and ran into several
problems. So, I switched to Redhat 6.2 and have had much fewer
problems. From my experiences, Redhat 6.2 will work a lot better.
---
Ryan M. Lefever
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:49:07PM -0400, GiantWEB wrote:
> Do U suggest using redhat 6.2 for now?
>
> I need a stable version to test..
I believe that your problem is different, as it gives errors in the
system headers (/usr/include/stdio.h).
Jan
Do U suggest using redhat 6.2 for now?
I need a stable version to test..
Thanks,
-Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jan Harkes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:44 PM
To: Ajay S. Kang
Cc:
Subject: Re: 5.3.14 compile problem
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:25:18PM -0400,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Ajay?S. Kang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded coda 5.3.14, lwp 1.7, rpc2 1.11 and rvm 1.4 and was able
> to configure and make lwp,rpc2 and rvm sucessfully. The configure
> script for coda also ran without errors. However when I ran make I
> got the followin
me too, just was talking to Jan about this..
Atleast it is not just me :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ajay S. Kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.3.14 compile problem
Hi,
I downloaded coda 5.3.14, lwp 1.7, rpc2 1.11 and r
Hi,
I downloaded coda 5.3.14, lwp 1.7, rpc2 1.11 and rvm 1.4 and was able
to configure and make lwp,rpc2 and rvm sucessfully. The configure
script for coda also ran without errors. However when I ran make I
got the following:
olist.cc:27:8: warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive
olist.
ok.. Thanks.. I got it and it passed the configure..
Now I am getting make errors.. This should not be that tough :-)
below is the output..
Thanks for your help, We are trying to demo the FS for webhosting load
balanced sites..
Matt
-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=
In file included from olist.h:41,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Jean-Loup DARNAY wrote:
> Please, i would like to know if there is some implementation of Coda on
> an DEC Alpha GNU/Linux platform or if someone did try to build one ?
> Thank you,
Not yet, we've only gotten to the point of cleaning up LWP and RVM for
64
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:47:06AM -0400, GiantWEB wrote:
> well, I dwnlded 5.3.14 and no luck..
>
> I searched on the cd of redhat and I have
> glibc-2.2-12 and the development
I wrote...
> Coda uses libdb 1.85 for some of the databases that are shared between
> servers. Your machine is possib
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:52:44PM -0500, Kelly Corbin wrote:
> I found the problem. updatesrv when called from codastart has the -p
> /vice/db option which sets the working directory as /vice/db. When the
> vice-setup script is run on the non-scm machine and calls updatefetch,
> it looks for
I found the problem. updatesrv when called from codastart has the -p
/vice/db option which sets the working directory as /vice/db. When the
vice-setup script is run on the non-scm machine and calls updatefetch,
it looks for $vicedir/db/servers which is actually /vice/db/db/servers
(it should
Please, i would like to know if there is some implementation of Coda on
an DEC Alpha GNU/Linux platform or if someone did try to build one ?
Thank you,
--
Jean-Loup Darnay / Open Mind.
L O G I C I E L S L I B R E S - S Y S T E M E S O U V E R
T S
Pétition contre les
well, I dwnlded 5.3.14 and no luck..
I searched on the cd of redhat and I have
glibc-2.2-12 and the development
this is stock redhat 7 patched and 2.2.19 kernel
still bails on:
> configure: error: failed to find libdb
Thanks in advance,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jan Harkes [mai
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:55:47AM -0400, GiantWEB wrote:
> that explains.. docs are not complete..
>
> Ok, I did what U said, now it went further but Bailed at:
>
> checking for dbopen in -ldb... no
> checking for dbopen in -lc... no
> checking for dbm_open in -lc... no
> configure: error: fail
that explains.. docs are not complete..
Ok, I did what U said, now it went further but Bailed at:
checking for dbopen in -ldb... no
checking for dbopen in -lc... no
checking for dbm_open in -lc... no
configure: error: failed to find libdb
here is tail of config.log:
Thanks
Matt
-=-=-=--=-=
You need to compile rpc2 & rvm to succesfully compile coda.
> checking for rdsinit... no
> checking for rvmutl... no
> checking location of liblwp... default
> checking location of librvm... none
> configure: error: Cannot determine the location of librvm
rvm missing :)
---
Cordiali saluti / Bes
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Steffen Neumann wrote:
> hoard walk
> and after some 12mins
> pioctl:Verify(-1, /tmp/fileWL7FDQ, 10157, 0): No such device
Is there any GetAttr/Fetch activity visible in the 'codacon' output
The "No such device" error is probably due to a cra
"GiantWEB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Then I did coda compile.. Below is the output of the configure..
>
> Do I need to compile rpc2-1.11 as well?? There is no mention of this in the
> docs, but I compiled it
Well, the tail of the config.log contains
a lot of *why* things failed.
Anywa
I am using Redhat 7, updated kernel to 2.2.19 and compiled switch for coda
in kernel to static (not module)
the box has its updates (patches) and then tried compiling as per
instructions.
I first did lwp-1.7 and it worked fine
Then I did coda compile.. Below is the output of the configure..
Do
Steffen Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Any ideas ? Any other Info that could be helpful ?
Well, remembering the recent near-online debugging session
here on the list I now have the stack trace of the dying venus,
maybe that helps.
So long,
Steffen
--
Hi,
I now have a reproducable problem hoarding files:
hoard list
<7f01, .>, 10157, 800:d+
<7f04, .>, 10157, 600:d+
<7f2a, .>, 10157, 800:d+
<7f30, .>, 10157, 600:d+
<7f41, .>, 10157, 800:d+
<7f45, .>, 10157, 600:d+
22 matches
Mail list logo
