I still have no sollution. I have followed all the steps for
installation but codasrv just vanishes? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Kersten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 8:57 PM
To: 'Jan Harkes'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: codasrv dissapear
Hi Derek,
> This implies that, if I want a 25 Gig volume (with its 1 Gig RVM
>metadata storage file), I need a 1 Gig Linux Swap partition (assuming that
>the term "virtual memory" above refers to the Linux swap partition).
>
> Yet Phil Nelson gave me his NetBSD example that shows th
After reading through the docs yet again, there appears to be
inconsistent information in the admin guide regarding virtual memory.
The admin guide says
(From http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/doc/html/manual/installsvr.html):
--
Virtual memory. The metadata, held in the RVM data file,
Derek Simkowiak writes:
>> just have 2 computers that are going to be using the data,
>
> It will first be two, but then should grow up to "several" nodes.
>
the firewire code in linux supports 4 hosts connecting to one device. as do
most of the firewire drives. Fibre channel supports
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:01:33AM -0700, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > try just a cluster{ed|ing} file system.
>
> That's what I'm after. How is CODA not a "cluster{ed|ing}"
> filesystem?
Coda is a distributed filesystem. The main difference (in my mind) is
that a distributed filesystem ass
> just have 2 computers that are going to be using the data,
It will first be two, but then should grow up to "several" nodes.
> try just a cluster{ed|ing} file system.
That's what I'm after. How is CODA not a "cluster{ed|ing}"
filesystem?
> OpenGFS,
http://opengfs.or
Sorry it took so long to reply I was trying to see how the answers panned
out for you.
If I understand you correctly Coda might be a little bit of overkill. If you
just have 2 computers that are going to be using the data, you may want to
try just a cluster{ed|ing} file system. OpenGFS, Oracl