Re: CODA and qmail ..

2003-03-31 Thread Jan Harkes
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Simone Sestini wrote: > At 13.30 31/03/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Simone Sestini wrote: > >> I'm installing a CODA farm for a mail project.. > >> Today i'm configuring the SCM Server and i did that kind of partition. > >> > >> Devic

Re: CODA and qmail ..

2003-03-31 Thread Simone Sestini
At 13.30 31/03/2003 +0200, you wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Simone Sestini wrote: > I'm installing  a CODA farm for a mail project.. > Today i'm configuring the SCM Server and i did that kind of partition. > > Device Boot    Start   End    Blocks   Id  System > /dev/sda1 1 

Re: CODA and qmail ..

2003-03-31 Thread Ivan Popov
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Simone Sestini wrote: > I'm installing a CODA farm for a mail project.. > Today i'm configuring the SCM Server and i did that kind of partition. > > Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System > /dev/sda1 164514048+ 82 Linux swap > /dev

CODA and qmail ..

2003-03-31 Thread Simone Sestini
Ok folks, I'm installing a CODA farm for a mail project.. Today i'm configuring the SCM Server and i did that kind of partition. Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System /dev/sda1 164514048+ 82 Linux swap /dev/sda2 *65 1339 10241437+ 83

Re: Coda and qmail

2003-01-09 Thread Jan Harkes
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:34:31PM +0100, Simone Sestini wrote: > I'm planning to do a new mail server project using qmail and coda. > Qmail menage coda with a simple patch file so no problem at all.. > I was planning to do 3 server machine > Each server machine will contain a 73Gb U160 HD and i'll

Coda and qmail

2003-01-07 Thread Simone Sestini
Hello all.. I'm planning to do a new mail server project using qmail and coda. Qmail menage coda with a simple patch file so no problem at all.. I was planning to do 3 server machine Each server machine will contain a 73Gb U160 HD and i'll partition it for use about 50Gb on each machine for the m

RE: coda and qmail, hard links

2000-01-12 Thread Mark Peglow
> -Original Message- > From: Shafeeq Sinnamohideen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Apparently Cyrus depends on file locking to prevent such > disasters from > happening. AFS and Coda do not provide this - they both use session > semantics (update on close) which somewhat reduces the usef

RE: coda and qmail, hard links

2000-01-12 Thread Shafeeq Sinnamohideen
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Mark Peglow wrote: > I tried this, but unfortunately it did not do the trick. What I am seeing > is > corruption in the cyrus.index and cyrus.cache files when they are written by > deliver and imapd. The cyrus reconstruct works (and corrects the mailboxes) > because it is

RE: coda and qmail, hard links

2000-01-12 Thread Mark Peglow
> From: Laszlo Vecsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > The tweaks needed were to redefine or change the 'link' and 'unlink' > functions in qmail's maildirdeliver and pine's maildir patch > with 'rename' > and 'remove' respectively. > > The only reason for using hardlinks for mail delivery, afaik

Re: coda and qmail, hard links

2000-01-12 Thread Laszlo Vecsey
The tweaks needed were to redefine or change the 'link' and 'unlink' functions in qmail's maildirdeliver and pine's maildir patch with 'rename' and 'remove' respectively. The only reason for using hardlinks for mail delivery, afaik, is to make storage on nfs reliable. But since we're using coda,

coda and qmail, hard links

2000-01-11 Thread Laszlo Vecsey
Theres a program called 'maildirdeliver' at the qmail.org page, which takes an email on input and delivers it into a directory with Maildir format. A program like this can be set as default delivery on the system or in a personal .qmail file in your home directory. I was thinking this program cou