-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have compiled CODA with support for Kerberos 5 in a Red Hat Linux 8.0 (GCC
3.2), but when I have tried to use it, I have got these lines ('coda' is the
host-name of the CODA server, and 'rafa' is a tested CODA user and K
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 04:46:01PM +, Mark Phalan wrote:
> I'm trying to get coda working with kerberos5 but am not having much success.
> I've followd the instructions in README.kerberos.
Try 'configure --with-crypto', the kerberos intergration was cleaned up
a lot
Hi,
I'm trying to get coda working with kerberos5 but am not having much success.
I've followd the instructions in README.kerberos.
When I run
clog -kerberos5
I get
"Unsupported authentication type"
I've noticed that none of the binaries created in the auth2 subdir (auth2,
clog,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I am not fully clear on the details below of the AFS changes for
> kerberos 5, but I thought it would be helpful for coda folks to be
> aware of what's going on (it was news to me).
Won't affect Coda. It looks lik
I am not fully clear on the details below of the AFS changes for
kerberos 5, but I thought it would be helpful for coda folks to be
aware of what's going on (it was news to me).
--- Forwarded Message
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 26 13:40:18 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAI
Hi all,
is there any step by step guride for setting up coda with kerberos?
or anyone can tell me HOWTO, I already have a mit krb5 DB.
Thanks
Ming
I'm playing on setting up a coda system that user Kerberos and
disconnected operation is an important feature. Are there any roadblocks I
should be aware of?
> Is there a PAM module that will authenticate users against coda auth
> server?
You _really_ don't want to do this. See previous traffic on this list,
and some of the documents on the (current) state of Coda security.
> Or is there kerberos/NIS(ack) support for coda?
There
Hi!
Is there a PAM module that will authenticate users against coda auth
server? Or is there kerberos/NIS(ack) support for coda? The goal is to get
users logged into coda at the same time as they log into client system.
--
Antti Andreimann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security Expert
Siidsisalik
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:58:12PM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> hostname returns "ace.maybe.net" also, btw. /etc/hosts only has 127.0.0.1
> with localhost and localhost.localdomain and ace.maybe.net is defined for
> 10.1.0.3 "properly".
Well, it was a try. I'm trying to figure out how the server
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jan Harkes wrote:
> > volumes. It seems my VLDB is not being created correctly? I ran the bld
> > script and nothing seems to happen. This is all fresh from 5.3.7. Here's
> > some interesting log snippets from /vice/db/SrvLog
> ...
> > 16:19:59 VGetPartition Couldn't find part
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:54:18PM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jan Harkes wrote:
> > Could you try moving that test back to the top of the function.
> > (rcp2/rpc2-src/secure.c:232)
>
> Ah, that seems to have worked.
Cool, I'll put rpc2-1.5 on the ftp site.
> volumes. It s
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 01:02:39PM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> server sends:
> > [11:55:56]Main Process: "packet.c", line 110:rpc2_XmitPacket()
> > Host.InetAddress = 10.1.0.5Port.InetPortNumber = 1049
> > Prefix: BufferSize = 350 LengthO
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:04:52PM -0700, Chris Jantzen wrote:
> I have installed coda-5.3.7 on an SMP Linux 2.2.14 machine based on Red
> Hat 5.2 (originally, due for upgrade ). I am successfully running
> Kerberos 5 from the MIT distribution (1.1.1) elsewhere on the network
> (inclu
I have installed coda-5.3.7 on an SMP Linux 2.2.14 machine based on Red
Hat 5.2 (originally, due for upgrade ). I am successfully running
Kerberos 5 from the MIT distribution (1.1.1) elsewhere on the network
(including on this host for rcmd-type stuff). Whenever I try to run kclog
into the server
of the coda
krb code, but it strikes me as unwise to try coda as the first
kerberos application.
If I misunderstood, and you've already done this, I don't understand
why you need a sample config file. I believe coda is simply a service
that uses kerberos, and doesn't impact co
both the client and server machines.. so kerberos
itself looks to be ok.
On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 08:08:37PM -0500, Laszlo Vecsey wrote:
> Quick question, do I need to recompile the coda server for kerberos
> support to work, or just the client (venus) and generate kclog?
Only clog and auth2 need to be rebuilt, (as kclog and kauth2). Only the
user identifi
Quick question, do I need to recompile the coda server for kerberos
support to work, or just the client (venus) and generate kclog?
Also does anyone have a login or radius program which will inject kerberos
principles into the database, as a method of converting from /etc/shadow?
I checked the
Due to changes in US policy on encryption is it possible now to export
kerberos support for coda?
Jurij Kotar
I wrote:
> Has anyone succeeded in using coda with Kerberos 5? (I'm
> actually using heimdal-0.2n.) I managed to get it to compile
> with some hacking, but I can't seem to authenticate using
> kclog, though kinit works perfectly well. I should say I'm
> using
Has anyone succeeded in using coda with Kerberos 5? (I'm
actually using heimdal-0.2n.) I managed to get it to compile
with some hacking, but I can't seem to authenticate using
kclog, though kinit works perfectly well. I should say I'm
using lwp-1.2 and coda-5.3.4. Coda mount
I've been trying to find documentation on this fruitlessly, but I was
wondering if someone could give me an example of the principals which need
to be setup on a Kerberos 5 server for the coda5 server, and what kind of
principals or other database modifications need to be made for each
> 3. (This probably belongs on the Kerberos newsgroup, but maybe someone
> has thought about this). There's still no reasonable Kerberos 5
> support for windows, right? Is there anything that I can link Coda
> against (and hopefully also have my Eudora users use?)
Hi
I have been planning to run kerberized coda in a FreeBSD and Linux
shop. I have also been planning to run Kerberos (on the grounds that,
if I'm going to have network authentication, it might as well be
something that I can use for other things).
Now I'm told that I'm g
27;s
> sslk5 working properly, we have a straight path from
>
> Smartcard->PKI->Kerberos V->distributed file system
>
> without all of the gunk that goes with a DCE arrangement, and (reasonably)
> cross platform from Win95, WinNT to Unix (well, Linux right now), but
> I might
- this should become a short section in the Coda
> > > HOWTO.
> >
> > I've built coda with kerberos support (reasonably straightforward), and
> > kinit works nicely. However, I suspect there is something non-obvious that
> > I am missing.
> >
> >
Good questions, Robert will have to be consulted to find out what we did
exactly and how it can be fixed.
Peter
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Peter J Braam wrote:
>
> >
> > There are two parts to this story:
> >
> > 1. sett
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Peter J Braam wrote:
>
> There are two parts to this story:
>
> 1. setting up a Kerberos 5 server - I found this hard.
done. This was really easy, since we are already using Krb5 for
authentication ;)
> 2. setting up our stuff - this should become a short
There are two parts to this story:
1. setting up a Kerberos 5 server - I found this hard.
2. setting up our stuff - this should become a short section in the Coda
HOWTO.
Volunteers?
Peter
At 11:58 PM 1/22/99 -0600, you wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I'
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'd like to get an idea of who is using KerberosIV and KerberosV support
> > in Coda.
>
> Me, for one. And it's very important. Now that I've got Doug Engert's
> sslk5 working properly, we have a straight path from
>
Robert Watson wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to get an idea of who is using KerberosIV and KerberosV support
> in Coda.
Me, for one. And it's very important. Now that I've got Doug Engert's
sslk5 working properly, we have a straight path from
Smartcard-&g
ral comments or suggestions
you might have that do not strictly constitute 'bugs'. This includes the
mapping issue (how to map Kerberos identities to Coda identities),
authorization issues, not to mention ease of use issues (such as: we
always use this command line flag, why isn't it the
33 matches
Mail list logo
