Jan Harkes wrote:
> . . . As Coda caches whole files, it is not very useful to actually have
> larger than 2GB files because it takes a lot of time to fetch/store such
> a large file (I know networking is getting faster every day, but still).
> However, being able to run Coda on 64-bit architectu
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 10:50:59AM -0600, Lou Langholtz wrote:
> > . . .
> > > 3. If coda supports bigger than 2GB caches, is the largest file size
> > > always the size of the cache or is it limited to 32bits large or
> > > something? Ie. is coda a 32 bit file system?
> >
> > Yes, Cod
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: newbie questions on sizes...
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:58:29AM -0600, Lou Langholtz wrote:
> > Hoping someone could easily answer some newbie questions for me:
> >
> > 1. The docs seem to encourage using caches of only 600MB
> . . .
> > 3. If coda supports bigger than 2GB caches, is the largest file size
> > always the size of the cache or is it limited to 32bits large or
> > something? Ie. is coda a 32 bit file system?
>
> Yes, Coda is still very 32-bit oriented. Even on a 64-bit processor,
> like the spa
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:58:29AM -0600, Lou Langholtz wrote:
> Hoping someone could easily answer some newbie questions for me:
>
> 1. The docs seem to encourage using caches of only 600MB or less. Is
> that just because it takes a while to prep a new cache or is there
> some techni
