On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Bruce Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>
> > > - small/medium scale testing,
> > >Nobody has ever done maildelivery in a Coda filesystem, not even for
> > >a single user. Yes, here a couple of us crazy developers do store our
> > >e
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > - small/medium scale testing,
> >Nobody has ever done maildelivery in a Coda filesystem, not even for
> >a single user. Yes, here a couple of us crazy developers do store our
> >email in Coda, but the delivery is still done to the loca
> - small/medium scale testing,
>Nobody has ever done maildelivery in a Coda filesystem, not even for
>a single user. Yes, here a couple of us crazy developers do store our
>email in Coda, but the delivery is still done to the local disk and
>only the `received' mailboxes are stor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| I really like the maildir suggestion.
| The one problem that I see is that if you have mail.example.com
| pointing to both client coda machines for pop/imap work, a message
| might be delivered to one of them before the other, in other words
| theres a race condition.
I really like the maildir suggestion.
The one problem that I see is that if you have mail.example.com pointing
to both client coda machines for pop/imap work, a message might be
delivered to one of them before the other, in other words theres a race
condition.
The user contacts 'mail.example.co
I have 2 more informations that may be usefull to the solve :
1 - 6 Mailboxes
2 - We use procmail with separed dirs for each letter, like :
/var/spool/mail/j/u/jungle
/var/spool/mail/r/o/rox
Changes anything?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> | We hav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
| We have here a mail system like this :
| 1 NFS Server (PII400 RAID5 and 128ram)
| 2 NFS Clients (pop/smtp) (PII900 SMP with 512Ram)
|
| The clients mounts the /var/spool/mail partition of the server, and
| uses it for pop (cucipop) and smtp (sendmail/procmail).
|
|
