Derek Simkowiak writes:
>> just have 2 computers that are going to be using the data,
>
> It will first be two, but then should grow up to "several" nodes.
>
the firewire code in linux supports 4 hosts connecting to one device. as do
most of the firewire drives. Fibre channel supports
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:01:33AM -0700, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > try just a cluster{ed|ing} file system.
>
> That's what I'm after. How is CODA not a "cluster{ed|ing}"
> filesystem?
Coda is a distributed filesystem. The main difference (in my mind) is
that a distributed filesystem ass
> just have 2 computers that are going to be using the data,
It will first be two, but then should grow up to "several" nodes.
> try just a cluster{ed|ing} file system.
That's what I'm after. How is CODA not a "cluster{ed|ing}"
filesystem?
> OpenGFS,
http://opengfs.or
ks,
> and because CODA can support more than one backup copy (i.e., several
> nodes can be in sync at once).
>
> Reading over the docs, some questions came up. The first one
> is... what should the "big picture" of this setup look like? Would each
> node in the c
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Ivan Popov wrote:
> I'm running typically with 90Mb cache.
Oops! No I am not. :-)
I mean 90 K == about 900 M of course.
Hope nobody has taken literally.
Yours,
--
Ivan
Hi Derek,
> First, can you substantiate your claim about the 1 Gig RVM limit?
It depends on the model your system uses. Most systems with a 32 bit
address space have a 4G VM limit. In some cases, the OS takes 2G for
the OS. Other OSes take less. You then need space for code, stack
and
Hello Derek,
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > Unfortunately, you can not count with having more than about 1G RVM per
> > one server process.
>
> First, can you substantiate your claim about the 1 Gig RVM limit?
> I just need something harder than "some guy on the mailing li
> trying to answer some questions based on my own experience, your mileage
> may vary.
Thank you for your help.
> I run a server with 4G and another one with about 10G, for a long time.
Excellent! Just the real-world proof I was looking for. I wish
this stuff were d
Hello Derek,
trying to answer some questions based on my own experience, your mileage
may vary.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> load-balanced cluster. They will drag and drop files to this WebDAV
> share, which will result in Apache/mod_dav writing a file to the th
ckup copy (i.e., several
nodes can be in sync at once).
Reading over the docs, some questions came up. The first one
is... what should the "big picture" of this setup look like? Would each
node in the cluster need to run both the CODA server _and_ client
software? I assume so, otherwise, how co
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, August [iso-8859-1] Hörandl wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am a teacher in a technical high school in vienna, austria
>
> We are considering coda and linux. We have got about 1500 pupils
> and 200 teachers working on about 170 workstations
You should be aware that Coda is at best bet
Hi,
I am a teacher in a technical high school in vienna, austria
We are considering coda and linux. We have got about 1500 pupils
and 200 teachers working on about 170 workstations
I would like to use coda for the home dirs and most of the
programs (/usr and /opt); the server to be is a piii 45
Hi,
I'm thinking about using coda in a development environment because of
the disconnected/slow connection benefits, and I'm not sure how to
evaluate the stability kinds of issues.
In principle, I'm very impressed and very excited, but I don't know what
the particularities are going to be like
13 matches
Mail list logo
