Coda is NOT suitable for database files! It does whole file updates.
- Peter -
>i'm curious as i'm interested in looking at coda to serve up some rather large
>db files to a few machines and the afs limitations won't cut it.
First, coda's design decisions have made it a poor choice for database applications.
You get session semantics rather than UNIX semantics on files and
what are the file/volume size limitations with coda?
afs 3.6a (beta) claims the following:
cache: 1g (700mb for current prod)
volume: 8g (2gb for current prod)
file: 2gb (2gb for current prod)
i'm curious as i'm interested in looking at coda to serve up some rather large
db files to a few mac
