ot clear on:
>
> We're currently running 30M(log)/500M(data) and I've found that I
> can't go to 30M(log)/1G(data), are there any other RVM data sizes that
> are available after the 500M one? If so then how are the sizes
> calculated?
You can get pretty much any size
approx. 15000 files for a total size of approx. 180Mb per volume.
I found that I typically hit the limit around 30K files in a volume on a
server with 200MB of RVM data. So 15000 does seem rather low.
> With 2M(log)/90M(data) we'd see the 'RVMLIB_ASSERT: error in rvmlib_malloc'
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 11:56:01AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Jan Harkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Is there a solution to this problem, or is coda not suitable for
> > > larger data sizes?
> >
> > In any case you need a lot of swap. But
Jan Harkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a solution to this problem, or is coda not suitable for
> > larger data sizes?
>
> In any case you need a lot of swap. But when the RVM data is in a file,
> it is possible to enable the use of private mmap
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:59:54PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> While small experiments worked fine, scaling this to larger data sizes
> seem problemtic. The size recomendation for the "rvm data partition"
> is 3-5 % of the total file data space. I also noted that this
&
Hi, I've gotten passed my first problems (thanks to does who
responded!) and gotten everything to work.
While small experiments worked fine, scaling this to larger data sizes
seem problemtic. The size recomendation for the "rvm data partition"
is 3-5 % of the total file data
