would two ethernet interfaces wig out a coda server?

1999-02-18 Thread sean dreilinger
hi again: thanks very much to everyone who has been writing with suggestions on making my new coda server work with remote clients. no success with any of the suggestions so far, but i have another question (sorry!). the coda server is running on a machine with two ethernet interfaces. venus cl

Re: would two ethernet interfaces wig out a coda server?

1999-02-18 Thread Greg Troxel
I have a coda server with 2 Ethernet interfaces (both normal routed addresses), one 10 Mb/s and one 100 Mb/s. The 10 Mb/s is primary, and the other is a testbed net. In the past I venus-setup'd a client to use the 100 Mb/s net, and also added host routes to server-10 interface to go via the 100

coda-src/dir/dirbody.c patch for *BSD

1999-02-18 Thread Matthew Fredette
Here's a patch for coda-src/dir/dirbody.c that fixes a problem we were seeing with large directories under NetBSD 1.3.3 and FreeBSD 2.2.6. readdir(3) on these machines treats directory entries that straddle a 4k boundary (readdir(3)'s buffer size) as end-of-directory markers. This patch to DI

Re: would two ethernet interfaces wig out a coda server?

1999-02-18 Thread jaharkes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: | remote venus client connections coming in from the outside world | through the second ethernet interface eth1 can see the coda server OK | (cmon servername:100 looks good) but never get hooked up. have watched | venus fail on several remote client machines that otherwise

Re: assorted patches against 5.0.1 & dirbody.c fix for **BSD**

1999-02-18 Thread Robert V. Baron
Thank you for the fixes that you recently sent. Funny thing, I was just going to sit down and do the dirbody.c fix (for large directories) just after lunch when I got your patch. I will slightly tidy up what you did and commit it. Also, the other changes that were send for the NetBSD sparc sup

Re: assorted patches against 5.0.1 & dirbody.c fix for **BSD**

1999-02-18 Thread Matthew Fredette
> Thank you for the fixes that you recently sent. Funny thing, I was > just going to sit down and do the dirbody.c fix (for large > directories) just after lunch when I got your patch. I will slightly > tidy up what you did and commit it. Also, the other changes that were > send for the NetBSD