On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> Any issue if I just make it part of my Python 3 checker pull request? It's
> obviously easier when I have my own checkers to make sure I'm not screwing
> it up. =)
Nope, it's fine with me if it'll be in your Python 3 checker pull request.
On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 2:59:04 PM Claudiu Popa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> > I just realized I should have checked setup.py to see if 2to3 was being
> > used, which it is. =) So it seems that I will have to port Pylint over
> to a
> > Python 2/3 source-compa
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> I just realized I should have checked setup.py to see if 2to3 was being
> used, which it is. =) So it seems that I will have to port Pylint over to a
> Python 2/3 source-compatible code base in order to pass any checks with my
> set of checke
On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 2:01:18 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
> I've started work on a pull request to add my Python 3 checkers into
> Pylint: https://bitbucket.org/brettsky/pylint . The work isn't quite
> done, but I have run into one issue where one of my checker is causing
> various regression tests to
I've started work on a pull request to add my Python 3 checkers into
Pylint: https://bitbucket.org/brettsky/pylint . The work isn't quite done,
but I have run into one issue where one of my checker is causing various
regression tests to fail across the board due to strings not being
specified as ei
Sure. I will try to make time next week to make a pull request against
Pylint with a checkers/python3.py or something.
On Fri Jul 25 2014 at 6:14:21 PM Claudiu Popa wrote:
> Hello Brett.
>
> At a quick glance, the patch looks really good, even with the scarce
> documentation that we have. :-)
>
Hello Brett.
At a quick glance, the patch looks really good, even with the scarce
documentation that we have. :-)
Maybe you can turn this into a pull request for Pylint, so that we may
have in the near future a mode that only checks Python 2/3
compatibility? That way would be easier for review, to
The Python 2/3 checkers I emailed this list about back in June I think are
now at a beta stage and can be viewed at
https://github.com/brettcannon/caniusepython3/blob/pylint/caniusepython3/pylint_checker.py
along with tests at
https://github.com/brettcannon/caniusepython3/blob/pylint/caniusepython3
