Will S writes:
> I am trying to understand why pylint treats module-level global
> variables as constants when checking the validity of their names.
One thing to realise is that this is a case where the term “variable”
doesn't really help us. The language only knows that it's a name bound
to an
I am trying to understand why pylint treats module-level global variables
as constants when checking the validity of their names. I though pylint
followed PEP8 but if I look here:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#id42 I see that global variables
should follow the same format as function na
