Done, thanks again!
Patrik Iselind
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Claudiu Popa
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Patrik Iselind
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, i got it to work now.
>>
>> I have some feedback on the page you referred to.
>>
>> I was missing the implements line as well. T
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Patrik Iselind
wrote:
> Thanks, i got it to work now.
>
> I have some feedback on the page you referred to.
>
> I was missing the implements line as well. This was not highlighted at
> all.
>
> Bullet two concerning priority. How checkers are ordered (internally?
Thanks, i got it to work now.
I have some feedback on the page you referred to.
I was missing the implements line as well. This was not highlighted at all.
Bullet two concerning priority. How checkers are ordered (internally?)
doesn't help me to decide if i should set a negative priority close
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:31 AM, mrx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can i find a bare minimum pylint checker that will successfully be
> registered and called?
>
> I've tried to write a checker like so:
> $ cat mychecker.py
> from pylint import checkers
> import pdb
>
> class Foo(checkers.BaseChecker):
