da Yelton
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:32 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
> bylaws?)
>
> In my experience on the LITA board (which Code4lib most emphatically is
> not), there are sometimes disc
Andromeda Yelton
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 9:32 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
bylaws?)
In my experience on the LITA board (which Code4lib most emphatically is not),
there are sometimes discussions where all the substant
t;), is there anyone here
>>> who
>>>> would not find the outcome of that decision to be legitimate?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Kim, Bohyun <b...@hshsl.umaryland.edu
>>>
>>&
nual Code4Lib conference have exceeded $250,000"
>> [
>>>>>> https://wiki.code4lib.org/FCIG_Report#Description_of_
>>> Current_Practice
>>>> <
>>>>>> https://wiki.code4lib.org/FCIG_Report#Description_of_
>>> Current_P
un<http://www.hshsl.umaryland.edu/>
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Code for Libraries <CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG> on behalf of Jonathan
> > Rochkind <jonat...@dnil.net>
> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:18 PM
> > To:
> > From: Code for Libraries <CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG> on behalf of Jonathan
> > Rochkind <jonat...@dnil.net>
> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:18 PM
> > To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
> &
nil.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:18 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
> bylaws?)
>
> > The bottom line is that we need some sort of entity if we want enter into
> an agreement with a fisca
;CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG> on behalf of Jonathan
Rochkind <jonat...@dnil.net>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 6:18 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
bylaws?)
> The bottom line is that we need some sort of en
s.org
> <mailto:esp...@stmarysathens.org>
> >
> > ____
> > From: Code for Libraries <CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG>> on behalf of Eric Hellman <e...@hellman.net
> <mailto:e...@hellman.net>>
> > Se
;mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG>> on behalf of Eric Hellman <e...@hellman.net
> <mailto:e...@hellman.net>>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:08:31 PM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG <mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG>
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib
.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Governance for Code4Lib (was: What's so bad about
bylaws?)
I've been pondering about this a fair amount.
I don't think Code4Lib is an "amorphous entity with no systematic way of
arriving at a decision or definable point of contact". Rather, it is a
dec
I've been pondering about this a fair amount.
I don't think Code4Lib is an "amorphous entity with no systematic way of
arriving at a decision or definable point of contact". Rather, it is a
decentralized community with long-established norms and consensus-based
procedures for discerning the
➢ So, in the spirit of the current way of doing things, I propose the
formation of an ad-hoc, self-nominated committee (perhaps the last of its kind)
to investigate a formal governance structure for Code4Lib and then assist the
Community with its implementation.
Isn’t this what the FCIG is
It is true that the Community has held 12 annual conferences without
formalization. And yes, it is likely *possible* to continue with the current
model of every conference being essentially a separate entity, and support from
the larger community being on an ad-hoc basis. But the reason we are
14 matches
Mail list logo
