Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

14, 2016 1:13 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from > Code4Lib? > > Is it really necessary for this list to affirm that it stands by > diversity? I have not encountered any negativity on this email list > mysel

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

It saddens me that something so obviously intrinsic to this organization is thought to be necessary. Usually an organization issues such a statement because their practices along such lines have been called into question, not because of the result of an election. Btw, what about Luddites, Trump

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

YES +1 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Kim, Bohyun wrote: > Hi Code4Libbers, > > What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity > basically affirming that we stand by it? > > If that _IS_ the majority opinion in Code4Lib which I am _POSITIVE_

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 >On 11/14/16, 4:04 PM, "Code for Libraries on behalf of Kim, Bohyun" > wrote: > >>Hi Code4Libbers, >> >>What do you think about issuing a post-election statement on diversity >>basically affirming that we stand by it? >> >>If that

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Shearer, Timothy wrote: > +1 > > - > Timothy J Shearer > Associate University Librarian for Digital Strategies and Information > Technology > University Libaries > University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill > 919

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 - Timothy J Shearer Associate University Librarian for Digital Strategies and Information Technology University Libaries University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 919 843-9516 tshearer at email dot unc dot edu On 11/14/16, 4:04 PM, "Code for Libraries on behalf of

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 Elizabeth Leonard 973-761-9445 -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Katie Sanders Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 4:16 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:33 PM, David Mayo wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 14, 2016 4:26 PM, "Jason Bengtson" wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Katie Montgomery > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

--- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG] On Behalf Of Michelle Lubatti Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 1:13 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib? Is it really necessary for this list to affirm that it stand

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 On Nov 14, 2016 4:26 PM, "Jason Bengtson" wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Katie Montgomery > wrote: > > > > I'm all for it. > > > > Best, > > > > Katie > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junior

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Katie Montgomery wrote: > > I'm all for it. > > Best, > > Katie > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Junior Tidal > wrote: > >> I think that's a great idea. >> >> Best, >> Junior >>

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

I'm usually more of an lurker than a commenter on this list, but I just want to say that in this political climate, I think public stands for diversity and against hatred are incredibly valuable and important, whether or not any incidents have yet occurred. Thanks to Bohyun for suggesting it. On

Re: [CODE4LIB] Post-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib?

-election statement affirming diversity from Code4Lib? Is it really necessary for this list to affirm that it stands by diversity? I have not encountered any negativity on this email list myself. Are others experiencing this? I am saddened to think that others are experiencing hurtful or bullying