LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple
declarations
CAUTION: This email message has been received from an external
source. Please use caution when opening attachments, or clicking on
links.
Steve, the list doesn't need to hear this, but you are
Steve McDonald
steve.mcdon...@tufts.edu
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries On Behalf Of
Karen Coyle
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 5:36 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple declarations
All,
] [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple
declarations
CAUTION: This email message has been received from an external source. Please
use caution when opening attachments, or clicking on links.
Steve, the list doesn't need to hear this, but you are not correct here.
The relators are defined
aren
Coyle
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 10:40 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple
declarations
tl;dr: Does LoC intend that its relator properties be used with both "thing" and
"string" objects?
kc
On 10/10
le
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 10:40 AM
> To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple
> declarations
>
> tl;dr: Does LoC intend that its relator properties be used with both "thing"
> and
> "string" o
steve.mcdon...@tufts.edu
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries On Behalf Of Karen
Coyle
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 5:36 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple declarations
All,
I am looking at the LoC relators at id.loc.gov, and am t
On Oct 15, 2023, at 12:51 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> One thing I keep running into is the downside of everyone creating their own
> vocabularies. It's easy enough to do, but 1) not everyone has a namespace
> they can use and 2) even if they have a namespace there is the maintenance
> problem.
,
Ben
*From: *Code for Libraries on behalf of Karen
Coyle
*Date: *Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 16:46
*To: *CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
*Subject: *Re: [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple declarations
Thanks, Ben, this is what I suspected and it is good to get a confirmation.
I've been doing a lot of work u
31097743%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=8FldNVQDoSMvgMt1sEI32GN1uucs%2FN%2Fu%2B0CPdt4Puak%3D=0<https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/ben-companjen>
>
>
>
> From: Code for Libraries on behalf of
9501, 2300 RA Leiden
E-mail:
b.a.compan...@library.leidenuniv.nl<mailto:b.a.compan...@library.leidenuniv.nl>
Web: https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/ben-companjen
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Karen Coyle
Date: Monday, 9 October 2023 at 23:36
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Sub
jen
From: Code for Libraries on behalf of Karen Coyle
Date: Monday, 9 October 2023 at 23:36
To: CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple declarations
All,
I am looking at the LoC relators at id.loc.gov, and am trying to
understand the implications of the multi
DE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG
> Subject: [External] [CODE4LIB] Question about multiple declarations
>
> All,
>
> I am looking at the LoC relators at id.loc.gov, and am trying to understand
> the
> implications of the multiple declarations for relator terms.
>
> rdf:resource="
All,
I am looking at the LoC relators at id.loc.gov, and am trying to
understand the implications of the multiple declarations for relator terms.
rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/contributor"/>
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ObjectProperty"/>
13 matches
Mail list logo
