Alexander Johannesen wrote:
I think you are quite mistaken on this, but before we leap into wheter
the web is suitable for SuDoc I'd rather point out that SuDoc isn't
web friendly in itself, and *that* more than anything stands in the
way of using them with the web.
It stands in the way of
Hey Ethan,
I worked for a number of museums before moving into Library work. I've
built web apps on top of museum collections before.
You might want to get on the Museum Computer Network email list:
http://www.mcn.edu/resources/index.asp?subkey=80
There are a lot of folks in the museum
While we're talking about coding for museums, I should announce that
I've just issued the first release of my Python module to interact
with the Brooklyn Museum Collection API. It's rough and really
lightweight, but it needs others to put it through its paces.
The module can be found on
Hiya,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:10, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:
It stands in the way of using them in the fully realized sem web vision.
Ok, I'm puzzled. How? As the SemWeb vision is all about first-order
logic over triplets, and the triplets are defined as URIs, if you can
pop
