Re: [CODE4LIB] Is there a (current) CONTENTdm support group?

I'm sure there are folks on this mailing list who use ContentDM. You could always post advances, trials, and tribulations here. Kevin On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Rod McFarland wrote: > Subject tells it all really, I've found some really old wikis and a bunch of > unhelpful Powerpoints vi

[CODE4LIB] Is there a (current) CONTENTdm support group?

Subject tells it all really, I've found some really old wikis and a bunch of unhelpful Powerpoints via Google. The forum on the official page seems to be pretty much dormant. Is there an untainted forum for CONTENTdm users/hackers/victims out there? I've pretty much given up on the OCLC support

Re: [CODE4LIB] New xforms4lib Google Group

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 18:47, MJ Ray wrote: > > Could you make it so that people can subscribe by email, without > signing up for a Google account, please? > > code4lib readers - anyone know what setting(s) to make that happen? No. But if that doesn't work out for y'all, you can always use the

Re: [CODE4LIB] New xforms4lib Google Group

Ethan Gruber wrote: > While I imagine that most people on the old xforms4lib list are also on > code4lib and will thus get duplicative emails, I wanted to briefly announce > that xforms4lib is migrating to a Google Group. This will provide greater > flexibility than the old system, which required

Re: [CODE4LIB] Adding VIAF links to Wikipedia

I went in and added VAIF links to a bunch of planetary scientists. We are working with NASA to improve the planetary science entries. Mostly, just raising awareness among the scientists that it is important. No negative comments on the VIAF links yet. A bot is something that will get more attentio

[CODE4LIB] New xforms4lib Google Group

Hi all, While I imagine that most people on the old xforms4lib list are also on code4lib and will thus get duplicative emails, I wanted to briefly announce that xforms4lib is migrating to a Google Group. This will provide greater flexibility than the old system, which required list admins to be U

Re: [CODE4LIB] Adding VIAF links to Wikipedia

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Ralph LeVan wrote: > OCLC Research would desperately love to add VIAF links to Wikipedia > articles, but it seems to be very difficult.  The OpenLibrary folks tried to > do it a while back and ended up getting their plans severely curtailed.  The > discussion at Wi

Re: [CODE4LIB] Adding VIAF links to Wikipedia

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Mark A. Matienzo wrote: > I would suggest engaging with the GLAM-WIKI project within Wikimedia > .  They held an unconference > recently in New York . I second Mark's advice. The

Re: [CODE4LIB] What does my solr index have against carbon dioxide?

There's some weridness with synonym expansion at query time when some of them are phrases. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory Looks like the suggested practice is to do synonym expansion at index time (e.g., the synonym filter with expand="true")

[CODE4LIB] Access 2011: Registration is open

Registration is now open for the Access 2011 Conference, to be held October 19-22 in Vancouver, British Columbia. See http://access2011.library.ubc.ca/registration/ for more details. Some other goodies now available on the conference website include a preliminary schedule, information on the p

Re: [CODE4LIB] What does my solr index have against carbon dioxide?

I don't use Solr but the obvious difference between the two synonyms is that methane is one word and carbon dioxide is two. Is there some phrase qualifier one needs to use with the Solr synonyms file? Bob Palian -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.ED

Re: [CODE4LIB] What does my solr index have against carbon dioxide?

You'll probably get a better response from solr-users. In any case, posting the relevant fieldtype definition from your schema.xml and, for good measure, the results of a query with debugQuery on would be helpful. Off the top of my head, I'd say it may be a combination of not using index time e

[CODE4LIB] What does my solr index have against carbon dioxide?

Greetings-- I'm trying to flesh out my synonyms.txt file for a couple of Solr indexes, and I stumbled across something weird. I added these lines to synonyms.txt: co2, carbon dioxide ch4, methane The second line worked as expected: I restarted Solr, reindexed, and could search ch4 and methane