I wrote up a piece on how to ask Freenode to temporarily raise/remove the
connection limit from the conference's IP block for the duration of the
conference. That has made a huge difference the past two years:
http://wiki.code4lib.org/index.php/How_To_Plan_A_Code4LibCon#Freenode_IRC_connection
I'
Ah, wasn't sure if that's what you were doing or not...
Yeah, Eric would have to supply those numbers (if they're even available?)
Kevin
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Nate Vack wrote:
> Right... but I don't have those messages going back to the first c4l.
>
> This year, it sounds like about
I could have gone the Python route, but tabs don't show up well in a two-color
design.
-Sean
From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] on behalf of Simon Spero
[s...@unc.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:45 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Right... but I don't have those messages going back to the first c4l.
This year, it sounds like about 1/4 as many people registered for the
conference as are on the list. Does that relationship hold for past
years?
-n
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:
> Another source... w
Another source... when you post to the list, you get an
acknowledgement back that includes:
"[Your message] has been successfully distributed to the CODE4LIB list
(1904 recipients)"
Eric, love the map...
Kevin
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
> The mailing list inclu
On 12/23/2011 1:17 PM, Nate Vack wrote:
As a guide to how many seats we may need to open up, it could be worth
looking at the size of this mailing list compared to the number of
registrations (waitlist included) for the conference.
Is there a relatively easy way to get that data? Historical list
The mailing list includes approximately 1800 people:
http://infomotions.com/blog/2011/03/where-in-the-world-is-the-mail-going/
--
ELM
As a guide to how many seats we may need to open up, it could be worth
looking at the size of this mailing list compared to the number of
registrations (waitlist included) for the conference.
Is there a relatively easy way to get that data? Historical list size
seems like it might be tricky...
-n
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Roy Tennant wrote:
> Having been one of those aforementioned people whining about the small
> conference experience, I hereby withdraw any objections I may have
> had. Let's celebrate the success of this community in its ability to
> welcome an ever-widening circ
I feel like this discussion is missing the boat. Let's be clear: there
are some aspects of small conferences that simply cannot be achieved
by large conferences -- you get to where you are swapping one bad
situation for another. Having said that, I think those of us who pine
for the small conferenc
On Dec 23, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Susan Kane wrote:
[trimmed]
> You could repeat the conference at a totally different time of year ...
> everyone who didn't get in is automatically registered for the second
> conference later that year ... kinda wacky but ...
>
> You could plan for a second confere
I think the repeating morning / afternoon concept has some merit, but
people would need to be assigned to the morning slot or the afternoon slot
on any given day to keep the room sizes reasonable. Hard to enforce but
necessary.
Maybe there is a big get-together. Maybe not. Maybe the smaller
get
There seems to be a character encoding error; #\( is rendering as #\{ and
#\) is rendering as #\}.
((believes ed.) (that (shurely (that (exists ?X (mistake ?X)))
Simon
On Dec 22, 2011 10:53 PM, "Ann Lally" wrote:
> Sean Hannan from Johns Hopkins University is the winner of the Code4Lib
> 20
13 matches
Mail list logo
