On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Andrew Hankinson <
andrew.hankin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As someone who works on document recognition, I have to disagree. You
> should always keep an uncompressed original around, since you can never
> recover it without (often expensive) re-imaging. JPEG, or any o
As someone who works on document recognition, I have to disagree. You should
always keep an uncompressed original around, since you can never recover it
without (often expensive) re-imaging. JPEG, or any other type of lossy
compression, introduces artifacts that don't look "too bad" by the human
Yes, exactly. You will loose some of the image quality. If you change to
a compressed format, then back to the TIFF, you can get the format, but you
can't go back to the original file.
Stop and think: What are your long term goals?
Big files are clunky to work with. I'm guessing that's why yo
Grade: 5
Salary Scale: £25,504 - £29,541 (Point 24 - 29)*
Contract: Full-time/ Open-ended
Closing Date: 06 May 2013
Ref: HR1597
Library Services at Glasgow Caledonian University wishes to appoint a Digital
Assets Manager. The role holder will have responsibility for the maintena
