Hi,
This doesn't help Bobbi any, but along the same lines, I've got a room at
a BB about ten minutes' walk from the Masonic Temple. Happy to have a
male non-smoker share the room, if anyone's interested. (It's $99 a night,
so half of that isn't too bad)
the room: http://bit.ly/Access2013Room
the
Hello,
I'm not sure how sensible a question this is (it's certainly theoretical), but
it cropped up in relation to a rare books cataloguing discussion. Is there a
standard or accepted way to express negatives in RDF? This is best explained by
examples, expressed in mock-turtle:
If I want to
Thomas-
This isn't something I've run across yet. But one thing you could do is create
some URIs for different kinds of unknown/nonexistent titles:
example:book1 dc:title example:unknownTitle
example:book2 dc:title example:noTitle
etc.
You could then describe example:unknownTitle with a label
+1
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Esmé Cowles escow...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Thomas-
This isn't something I've run across yet. But one thing you could do is
create some URIs for different kinds of unknown/nonexistent titles:
example:book1 dc:title example:unknownTitle
example:book2 dc:title
Be semantic / Win money - the winning entries should be quite
interesting. - kc
Original Message
Subject: Semantic Web Challenge 2013: Deadline Approaching
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:47:29 +
Resent-From: public-openannotat...@w3.org
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:47:00
At a theoretical level, doesn't the Open World Assumption in RDF rule out
outright negations? That is, someone else may know the title, and could
assert it in a separate RDF document. RDF semantics seem to conflate
unknown with nonexistent.
Practically, Esme's approach seems better in these
On 9/13/13 5:51 AM, Esmé Cowles wrote:
Thomas-
This isn't something I've run across yet. But one thing you could do is create
some URIs for different kinds of unknown/nonexistent titles:
example:book1 dc:title example:unknownTitle
example:book2 dc:title example:noTitle
etc.
I'm bothered by
Hi all,
I'm looking for a tool that I hope exists, and that I hope someone here might
be able to point me too. I want to select a portion of a web page (or of the
html behind it), and be able to copy it ALONG WITH whatever CSS rules apply to
that section of code. I don't want the whole 1000+
Hey, I'm staying there too! It looked like such a charming place. See you
soon,
Roy
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Joseph Montibello
joseph.montibe...@dartmouth.edu wrote:
Hi,
This doesn't help Bobbi any, but along the same lines, I've got a room at
a BB about ten minutes' walk from the
The MARC21 Authority format does have some negative assertions. Field 675
asserts that a source contains no relevant information (vs. 670 which
asserts the source and its relevant information). Field 673 asserts that a
title is not related to the entity in the 1XX (vs. 672 which asserts that
the
Thanks everyone for your helpful feedback on the PHP HTTP Client
library. I ended up choosing Guzzle and am in the process of
incorporating and testing it. If you're interested in my rationale and
when the OCLC WSKey (Web Service key) code library will be available,
check out my post on the
OWL contains some negative assertions, as Thomas noted. Nothing prevents
anyone else from negating your negative, however, in that Open World.
Assuming that we have provenance on statements, then you might be able
to make sense of two conflicting bits of information.
I've found two
The University of California, Santa Barbara, one of ten campuses of the
University of California system, is seeking dynamic, flexible, and highly
motivated candidates for the position of Performing Arts Cataloger/Metadata
Librarian to provide leadership in creating, reviewing, editing metadata for
I can't speak for the other browsers, but at least in Chrome, it's pretty
easy to determine which rules are applied and which are overriden for
whatever reason
On Sep 13, 2013 8:36 AM, Ken Irwin kir...@wittenberg.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a tool that I hope exists, and that I hope
14 matches
Mail list logo
