On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, MJ Ray m...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Eric Hellman wrote:
Are you arguing that reCaptcha cannot be accessible or that it is
incorrectly implemented on this site?
Primarily that it is incorrectly implemented. However, I've yet to
see an implementation of
Why don't systems use the 900 fields for local stuff like this? That's what
they're there for, right?
--Casey
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Steve Oberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
This is definitely not a feature of MARC but rather a feature of your local
ILS (Aleph 500). Those are
One could embed the actual cataloging record data in the thumbnails using
steganography...
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Peter Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looked at another way: a thumbnail is just a bit of visual metadata,
and you cannot copyright metadata.
--peter keane
SRU is crap, in my opinion -- overengineered and under-thought,
incomprehensible to non-librarians and burdened by the weight of history.
The notion that it was designed to be used by all kinds of clients on all
kinds of data is irrelevant in my book. Nobody in the *library world* uses
it, much
My opinion is that this sounds like a very odd or poorly-designed API. If
some of their APIs are for unreleased or experimental features, I understand
having NDA's for those. But for the most part, the API should cover the
core functions of the product. What those core functions are should be
No, you could write them in J [1]. This is how you do quicksort in J:
quicksort=: (($:@(#[) , (=#[) , $:@(#[)) ({~ [EMAIL PROTECTED])) ^: (1#)
--Casey
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_programming_language
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Tim Shearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now I
Sorry, I only submit to conferences where the CFP is a Petrarchan sonnet.
None of that Shakespearean Sonnet 2.0 crap for me.
--Casey
On 11/28/07, D Chudnov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hear ye, hear ye, the deadline comes anon,
but we have yet to hear from most of you.
What hacks, pray tell,
I've said it before and I'll probably say it again: OSLC anyone? OCLC is too
large and too old to substantially change their business practices. They have
great people working there and do some excellent things (which is why the fact
they won't share their goodies with the rest of us is so
This is my current gig; I am moving into a new position at SPL. Given that
Seattle is both the most literate [1] and the geekiest [2] city in the United
States, this would seem to be the perfect position for a library geek. Don't
hesitate to email me if you have any questions.
--Casey
I think there are many good reasons why XSLT is absolutely the wrong tool for
the job of indexing MARC records for Solr.
1) Performance/Speed: In my experience even just transforming from MARCXML to
MODS takes a second or two (using the LoC stylesheet), due to the stylesheet's
complexity
you are saying. However I anxiously await
your presentation on your successes with SOLR so you can persuade me to
the dark side :)
Casey Durfee wrote:
I agree with your argument of abstracting your programming from your
data so that a non-tech-savvy librarian could modify the solr settings
Many ILSes give the ability to export item data in the MARC record in a 9xx
tag, (usually the 949 since BT and other book jobbers like to put holdings
data for newly-acquired items there so the ILS can automatically create an item
record when the MARC record is loaded). That is how I've been
Any Real System Guy worth their salt would know how to set up an account
for you to use for SQL queries like these with read-only rights and low
processing priority/throttling so there would be little to no chance of
it affecting system performance. Even if they don't know, they could
find out
Lucene syntax for sorting:
http://incubator.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html#Sorting
I do have a layer of abstraction between the end-user search interface and
Lucene -- you'd have to have such a layer no matter what search engine you were
using.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/27/2006 2:49 PM
Casey
Jetty's [1] tiny and a breeze to embed.
[1] http://jetty.mortbay.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/13/2006 1:01 PM
On Oct 13, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Susan Teague Rector wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is not doable this way - You'll have to use
either JSP or servlets to get from a web based form to a java
15 matches
Mail list logo
