Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-23 Thread Boheemen, Peter van
: woensdag 22 februari 2012 23:18 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations On 2/22/2012 5:10 PM, Sebastian Karcher wrote: Because Trac and Git have come up: Zotero has switched from Trac/SVN to Git and I (and I think everyone else involved) much prefers git

[CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Cynthia Ng
Hi All, We're looking at implementing an issue tracker for internal use, so I'm looking for recommendations. What's key: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box 2) small scale is okay, we have a very small team 3) ideally, have an area for documentation and issue

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Michael J. Giarlo
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:36, Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: What's key: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box 2) small scale is okay, we have a very small team 3) ideally, have an area for documentation and issue creation via email What does your

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Sean Hannan
Not Jira. -Sean On 2/22/12 12:36 PM, Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We're looking at implementing an issue tracker for internal use, so I'm looking for recommendations. What's key: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box 2) small scale is

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Francis Kayiwa
On 2/22/12 11:59 AM, Sean Hannan wrote: Not Jira. Not RT. ./fxk -- I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own Church.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Nate Vack
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box You might look into github for this. If you're doing something internal with a small team, the $7 or $12/month plans might do well for you. -n

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Stephanie Collett
Most of our teams use Redmine. It's very lightweight. On smaller projects we use the wiki for documentation. The markup has shorthand for linking back to issues which comes in handy. There are two ways to setup email issue creation/closing. If you use the SMTP option, email is very easy to setup.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Erin R White/FS/VCU
Web Systems Librarian, VCU Libraries 804-827-3552 | erwh...@vcu.edu | www.library.vcu.edu From: Nate Vack njv...@wisc.edu To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Date: 02/22/2012 01:08 PM Subject:Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations Sent by:Code for Libraries CODE4LIB

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Cary Gordon
Redmine would probably be a very good fit for what you want. It does support email ticket creation. We like Jira, but dialing it in can take a pretty substantial effort. Cary On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We're looking at implementing an

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Varnum, Ken
Unless your alternative is Footprints. Gah. On 2/22/12 12:59 PM, Sean Hannan shan...@jhu.edu wrote: Not Jira. -Sean On 2/22/12 12:36 PM, Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We're looking at implementing an issue tracker for internal use, so I'm looking for recommendations.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Francis Kayiwa
On 2/22/12 12:05 PM, Nate Vack wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Cynthia Ngcynthia.s...@gmail.com wrote: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box You might look into github for this. Oh yeah! Clever! If you're doing something internal with a small team,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread James Stuart
We have the heavyduty solution (JIRA/Greenhopper), but there's a lot of nice relatively cheap web stuff that I think might fit your bill. Just one of the many, many solutions out there: Github for documentation/lightweight issue tracking getdonedone can link to your github and has a lot more

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Cynthia Ng wrote: Hi All, We're looking at implementing an issue tracker for internal use, so I'm looking for recommendations. What's key: 1) minimal effort in install/setup i.e. ready to use out of the box 2) small scale is okay, we have a very small team

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Brad Rhoads
I've been happy with Trac. It does have good SCM integration. Many of the options listed have VMs available at places like turnkeylinux.org or bitnami.org. You might try out this custom google search I put together: http://ontherhoads.org/brad/2012/02/vm-search-engine/

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread MJ Ray
Cynthia Ng cynthia.s...@gmail.com What does your institution use? What do you like and dislike most about it? Would you recommend it to others? RT and Trac. RT has tons of features, is easy to extend and build lots of dependencies on, which is why it's still in use, but it can be a bit

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Cynthia Ng
Thanks for all the responses, everyone. If there are any more, I'd still like to hear them. Should probably add that 4) it's more for issue tracking/documentation i.e. code versioning/repository is not a priority right now (though it's great if it has that feature) There will be discussions with

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Sarr, Nathan
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cynthia Ng Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:46 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations Thanks for all the responses, everyone. If there are any more, I'd still like to hear them. Should probably add that 4) it's more for issue

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Sebastian Karcher
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations Thanks for all the responses, everyone. If there are any more, I'd still like to hear them. Should probably add that 4) it's more for issue tracking/documentation i.e. code versioning/repository is not a priority right now

Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations

2012-02-22 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Cynthia Ng Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:46 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Issue Tracker Recommendations Thanks for all the responses, everyone. If there are any more, I'd still like to hear them. Should probably add that 4) it's more for issue